• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    O, a meaning!
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    June 20, 2019, 10:58 a.m.

    Congratulations to Slack, the now-public company that keeps thousands of newsrooms humming

    /giphy ring the bell at nyse

    Who said there’s no money in journalism? Sure, maybe the old ad model is decaying, and maybe hundreds of newspapers are on death watch — but the work-chat app has been able to build a multi-billion-dollar business at least in some tiny part based on its remarkable uptake in newsrooms around the world.

    Slack becomes a publicly traded company today — through a , a , help-our-current-employees-and-backers move that fits well with the early-web vibes the company has given off since launch. (CEO previously co-founded Flickr; after Yahoo acquired it, he left that company with one of history’s . For me, he and other Slack folk like and have always evoked a kinder, gentler version of the Internet from the late 1990s and early 2000s, and I think you can find some of that DNA in the product today. I mean, its name is slack.)

    Slack in August 2013 and in February 2014, and some of the earliest and most eager adopters were newsrooms — particularly the tech teams inside news companies. We wrote our first story about it in June 2014:

    The Internet has no shortage of chat platforms, and each has its own strengths. But for whatever reason, Slack seems to have grabbed a big share of the digital newsroom market in almost no time. (It was only released publicly in February.) Along with [The New York] Times, Slack’s in use at BuzzFeed, The Times of London, The Atlantic, Business Insider, Quartz, Slate, NBC News, The Guardian — and even here at AndroidForMobile Lab.

    [Editor’s note: We love Slack and use it all day. —Josh]

    And yes, we did indeed start using it days after its public launch:

    Slack has indeed become the central nervous system of many newsrooms, replacing endless email threads and becoming a friendly universal archive for information and documents. We’ve written 36 stories that at least mention Slack in some significant way in the years since, chronicling the various ways journalists and their colleagues have tried to use it — including:

    Slack as a way to convert internal chats into outward-facing content or liveblogs (a format that’s since been )

    Slack as a tool 7 different newsrooms integrate into their workflows

    Slack as a home for in-house newsroom tools to help with things like social promotion

    Slack as a news-distribution platform or as a subscriber benefit

    Slack as an audience-engagement tool for conversations with reporters or an archival discovery tool

    Slack as an all-consuming attention-hoarder that a newsroom needs to take a structured official break from once in a while

    Slack as cross-newsroom collaboration tool

    Slack as a constructed reader community around a given topic

    Slack as a way to improve journalists’ use of analytics

    Slack as automated reporting tool

    Slack as a home for wayward ducks

    At this point, there may be more newsrooms running on Slack than there are on Microsoft Word. While Slack has obviously grown beyond its initial success in newsrooms, the fact that it took hold among journalists early certainly didn’t hurt promotion. (Journalists like to talk about themselves, you may have noticed.) Slack’s still highlights media companies as one of its most important user groups.

    means that Slack is worth something like $17 billion. (For those scoring at home, that’s about 3× the value of The New York Times Company.)

    Are there any lessons from Slack’s success that might apply to news companies? I can think of a few. Slack worked great on mobile devices from Day 1 and never viewed phones as a kid-sister platform to the “real” Slack on desktop. Slack built a great free product that let anyone sample it and get hooked — and then a smart upsell with clearly delineated benefits that made sense for heavy users. Slack realized that getting revenue from users is a more sustainable business model than selling their attention to advertisers, and they realized that companies have an easier time writing a big check than individual users do writing lots of small ones. Slack grew in large part through organic sharing, happy customers telling other people about it. And Slack solved a real problem — the tyranny of email — in a clear and easy-to-understand way. Those are all things that most media companies have been hit-or-miss on, and they’re all worth thinking about when building a news product.

    But on this landmark day in Slack’s history, let me just, on behalf of journalists everywhere, send a grateful :heart_eyes_cat: and a heartfelt /giphy congrats in its general direction.

    Slack branding materials by used under a Creative Commons license.

    POSTED     June 20, 2019, 10:58 a.m.
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
    Show comments  
    Show tags
     
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    O, a meaning!
    Fifty years ago, with humanity about to reach the moon, The New York Times gave a poet a corner of the front page.
    Who wants to share government content? In recent European elections, not many people
    Plus: How college students evaluate fake vs. real news, and an algorithm that doesn’t just identify fake news but explains why.
    Newsonomics: It’s looking like Gannett will be acquired by GateHouse — creating a newspaper megachain like the U.S. has never seen
    A combined GannHouse (Gatenett?) would own 1 out of every 6 daily newspapers in America. The goal? Buy two or three more years to figure out how to make money in digital.