• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Support for Julia Angwin grows as funders investigate the “coup” at The Markup
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    April 10, 2019, 1:20 p.m.

    The world is on fire, and that makes for good #brand #synergy between a fashion brand and The New York Times

    Today, even the newsiest of news organizations are also lifestyle brands.

    The conventional wisdom has long been that , huge catastrophes, or anything else that could make a target consumer bummed about the state of humanity when they should be contemplating the New! Shaving! Revolution! that Unilever now has the privilege of bringing you. As CNN’s put it in a speech last year: “In these turbulent times, advertisers might not want to be associated with news that is just bad. You can kinda understand that.”

    But now — thanks to the odd way that corporations and performative wokeness braid into the tapestry of 21st-century consumer capitalism — one fashion brand is teaming up with The New York Times to sell t-shirts, celebrate journalism, save the world from climate change, or all of the above.

    The fashion brand is , and today it announced the New York Times : a t-shirt and a sweatshirt (pardon, a “French Terry Crew”), each emblazoned with recent Times marketing messages about the value of truth and one mention of the phrase “climate change” on the back. For every piece sold — $22 for the t-shirt, $50 for the sweatshirt — the Times will give nine high school students free access to NYTimes.com for a year, which of course costs the Times roughly zero dollars, but which nonetheless gives meaning to the second half of :

    Show your support for the truth—
    and help inspire a future generation.

    Everlane, founded in 2010, offers “luxury essentials,” which isn’t far from how the Times pitches $15-a-month subscriptions to a better quality of news than you can get on Facebook, the clear Old Navy in this analogy. : That’s the weekday wardrobe of the market segment the Times most wants to reach, the educated upper-middle class. (Everlane says have at least some college education.)

    It’s not quite the socioeconomic tier that the Times’ service journalism is aimed at. But there are a lot more people in that Everlane tier.

    And like the Times, Everlane sells its goods via a handful of aspirational values — transparency, ethics, environmental responsibility, capital-t Truth. And it makes the narrative of the consumer good’s path to your UPS guy an intrinsic part of the packaging. ( is the newspaper’s equivalent of “We from Inner Mongolia.”)

    Here’s how Everlane’s marketing team describes the partnership:

    Since its early days, Everlane has been committed to transparency and educating consumers on the facts — from true cost breakdowns and factory practices to sustainability struggles in the retail industry. The New York Times has set journalistic standards by tirelessly seeking the truth and helps make even the most complex topics understandable. This Earth Day, the two brands are working together — through a product partnership and Everlane site experience that highlights groundbreaking Times reporting — to shine a light on the most important story of our time: climate change.

    I’m not sure where the Everlane Climate Collection French Terry Crew will end up on the Media Merch Cultural Signification Rankings — my guess is below “New Yorker tote bag” but ahead of “.” But it’s a reminder that — as geographically driven mass media has given way to psychographically driven digital media — even the newsiest of news organizations are also lifestyle brands. New York Times superfans can now literally clothe themselves in the drapery of upmarket coastal liberalism.

    Look, I love The New York Times, my wife says she likes this one Everlane shirt that she has, climate change is the defining crisis of our lifetimes, and everyone here seems well-intentioned. But while plenty of media products have long based their audience relationships on a sense of shared values and meaning, it’s still a sort of uncomfortable place for a newspaper of record to be.

    To the extent that newspapers marketed themselves to readers in the past — and they often didn’t do much — it was typically around some promise of utility. $200 of coupons every Sunday! Read the news everyone will be talking about! Late baseball scores, closing stock prices, plan your weekend, news you can use!

    But the most utilitarian parts of the old newspaper package have been stripped away, by Craigslist, Yelp, Facebook, Google, ESPN, Groupon, and the rest. The newsy core that remains is harder to pitch on usefulness — but for a certain kind of conscious consumer, it can be pitched on values and meaning. And millennials keep telling consumer researchers that they want , , , , , . That kind of search for consumerist meaning is what leads to a Heather Grey French Terry Crew advertising Truth.

    Back when the 2016 presidential campaign was still in its early stages, , the Times’ chief operating officer, came to a realization. “We needed to start thinking about The New York Times as a consumer brand, and take its power as a brand much more seriously,” . “There was always this sense that we had this opportunity…to begin to behave more like a world-class consumer brand.”

    She was absolutely right, and the huge success the Times has had in driving digital subscriptions is evidence of the power of a more meaning-based pitch. A strong brand is a powerful thing, and the Times is uniquely positioned to take advantage of its own.

    But brand values can exclude as much as they include. Not everyone likes their shoe company to be woke, or their phone company to fight for social justice, or their toilet paper to try to save the world. And it’s not just about politics — it’s also .

    Chasing the dollars of creative-class Everlane-wearing Whole Foods shoppers is almost certainly a smart business decision — they’ve got money! But one of the most unfortunate impacts of digital transformation is that formerly “mass” media now has to be more explicit about defining its audience, in ways that are more tied up with personal identity than “people who live in Kansas City.” And if you’re not the sort of person entranced by Grade-A Inner Mongolian cashmere, the Times is — subtly, without meaning any harm — saying their audience isn’t you.

    POSTED     April 10, 2019, 1:20 p.m.
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
    Show comments  
    Show tags
     
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Support for Julia Angwin grows as funders investigate the “coup” at The Markup
    After her ouster as editor-in-chief, multiple funders say they are taking steps to “reassess” their support.
    Collaboration jackpot: How three local journalism projects in Europe are getting more bang for their buck
    A case study into local news collaborations in Italy, the U.K., and Finland suggest some methods that any newsroom can use.
    Culture clash or compatibility? Despite some flashy differences, British and German media cultures share a lot of similarities
    Agenda-setting tabloids vs. muted restraint: Journalists in the two European countries may seem to have divergent views of their roles, but new data suggests they’re not all that different.