• Fellowships
  • Reports
  • Lab
  • Storyboard
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at Harvard
    HOME
              
    Foundation
    Reports
    Storyboard
    LATEST STORY
    “Publishers are going to live or die based on their relationship with readers”: How Quartz is rethinking its membership offerings
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Nov. 5, 2018, 11:59 a.m.
    The New York Times asked for examples of election disinformation — and got 4,000 responses
    LINK: www.nytimes.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Christine Schmidt   |   November 5, 2018

    This election might have less misinformation than 2016’s race, but “Christine Blasey Ford — proudly posing with Soros” and “We’re making a Woman’s Vote Worth more by staying home” are still out there.

    The New York Times’ Kevin Roose (and other reporters and editors) sifted through more than 4,000 examples of misinformation on social media, messaging apps, and emails submitted by readers over the past two months. “Times journalists are hoping to use your tips to advance our reporting. If you see a suspicious post or text, please take a screenshot and upload it with the form below,” Roose wrote in mid-September.

    The submissions helped fuel the Times’ reporting (engagement work pioneered by ProPublica and others) and chronicle the types of misinformation spread around the internet. Heck, maybe it even helped readers think twice about that sketchy text message “BREAKING: Andrew Gillum may be under an ‘active criminal investigation.'”

    The callout asked only about disinformation; the post about the responses, however, focused on misinformation. While we are glad to see no mention of f— news in either writeup, it would probably help the discussion to make the distinction between the two: disinformation being the intentional dissemination of false info to deceive, misinformation being false info spread possibly on accident when people really don’t realize it’s not true. This might be a chicken-and-an-egg scenario — when does disinformation turn into misinformation? Did the readers submit the bad posts after seeing it from the Russian Facebook pages or their friends who believed it and shared it? — but cheers for those academic terms starting to enter mainstream media more.

    The top disinformation themes that New York Times readers sent in include:

    • “Hoax floods” in the wake of major news events, like the confirmation hearings of Brett Kavanaugh and the caravan of Honduran migrants;
    • Campaign ads that take advantage of Facebook’s loopholes, letting ad buyers fill in the “Paid for” entry with fake groups like “Ninja Turtles PAC” and “a freedom loving American Citizen exercising my natural law right, protected by the 1st amendment and protected by the 2nd Amendment.” (Imagine reading that disclosure on a quick broadcast ad);
    • Russia manipulating Reddit’s largest pro-Trump forum with misleading web addresses taking clickers to Russia’s USAReally website;
    • Attempts to suppress voter turnout, with a post focusing on hunter turnout in North Dakota and another post about men cheerily staying away from the polls with a “Democrats: Change That Matters” logo;
    • Using doctored photos to make deceptive claims about candidates, like the Muslim Brotherhood supporting Georgia’s Stacey Abrams;
    • And suspicious text messages showing up in cell phone users’ inboxes from Florida to Indiana.
    • See the reader-submitted screenshots (and the Times’ follow-up reporting here).

      Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
     
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    “Publishers are going to live or die based on their relationship with readers”: How Quartz is rethinking its membership offerings
    “It’s more similar to an Audible.com subscription, where you’re getting access to this huge library of journalism, than it is to a daily news subscription.”
    The Los Angeles Times and its union now have a contract and (maybe) everyone is happy
    “With this agreement, I am convinced we have assured the revival of The Times under local ownership.”
    ProPublica and The Texas Tribune are teaming up on a full-time, Texas-focused investigative news unit
    “This is not ProPublica Texas. This is a very different entity — a cobranded, co-managed operation that brings together the natural strengths of two different but compatible organizations.”