• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    Support for Julia Angwin grows as funders investigate the “coup” at The Markup
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    March 25, 2019, 9:18 a.m.

    Instead of helping Canadian news startups, a new government subsidy will only prop up failed models

    “We don’t need a handout. But a policy that actively disincentivizes new media outlets from launching and growing to serve the information needs of Canadians is bad policy.”

    Editor’s note: In Canada, the Trudeau government has pledged, controversially, to provide financial support for the country’s ailing news industry. Last week, the release of its annual budget , which include a tax credit for companies employing journalists, tax benefits for those who subscribe to digital news outlets, and rules to make it easier to make tax-deductible donations to some newsrooms. To illustrate some of the debate around the topic, today we’re publishing three pieces by Canadian journalists, each of whom opposes the plan for distinct reasons. Below is a piece by , founder and CEO of Vancouver-based ; also be sure to check out the pieces by Carleton University’s Chris Waddell and The Logic’s David Skok.

    Tuesday’s federal budget announcement provided some long-awaited details about how the government’s to support journalism will be rolled out. Disappointingly, the policy seems purpose-built to help only one kind of media: newspapers.

    Here’s how it will work: An “independent” panel will be struck to certify “Qualified Canadian Journalism Organizations.” To qualify, media have to employ more than two journalists as employees and primarily produce general-interest news in written format. (See the full policy on page 373 of the .)

    Broadcasters are out. (Sorry, .) Podcasters are out. (Boo hoo, and .) Scrappy startups launched by journalist entrepreneurs are out. (Forget it, and .) Publishers that focus on a specific gap in coverage, such as the lack of in-depth reporting on the innovation economy or the environment, are out. (Nothing for .)

    To be clear, it is possible that The Discourse will be eligible to receive labor subsidies worth as much as a $250,000 per year — which would certainly help. But the only reason we will be eligible is because we have gotten as far as we have, to a team of 16 including 9 employees serving three communities. How did we do it? Elbow grease, bootstrapping, stubbornness, and, frankly, personal risk. And if this policy had existed when we launched five years ago, it would have been much more difficult to get The Discourse off the ground.

    The Discourse started like so many other new media outlets in Canada. We are journalists who saw a specific gap in public service coverage, so we rolled up our sleeves and started an organization to fill that gap. We started by focusing on a single subject. It was years before we grew enough to hire other journalists.

    “I launched Canadaland solo & did it part-time for a year before I started hiring,” . “The bailout could have encouraged dozens more individuals to do the same, but explicitly excludes them instead.”

    In 2017, then-Heritage Minister Melanie Joly : “Our approach will not be to bail out industry models that are no longer viable. Rather, we will focus our efforts on supporting innovation, experimentation, and transition to digital.”

    The newspaper lobby clearly succeeded in changing that strategy.

    None of the digital media entrepreneurs I know are asking for government help to get their projects off the ground. They’re just doing it — growing outlets from the ground up on their own by responding to demand where mainstream media is falling short. Even with Joly’s statement, none of us expected this package would provide a windfall for startups.

    But we also didn’t expect that it would distort the playing field so dramatically in favor of legacy newspapers — a model that is failing both as a business and to serve diverse audiences of Canadians.

    As it stands, this package provides resources to big newspaper chains to hire journalists to compete directly with startups. So while Jesse Brown’s Canadaland can’t access any support, the National Post could use it to fund journalists to create a media criticism podcast. The Toronto Star could hire subsidized journalists to compete with The Logic’s of Sidewalk Toronto.

    The investigative journalist Tim Bousquet, who founded Halifax Examiner, that for his news outlet, the policy may “mean, necessarily, putting off expansion plans, as the market is suddenly an even less level playing field.”

    We don’t need a handout. But a policy that actively disincentivizes new media outlets from launching and growing to serve the information needs of Canadians is bad policy.

    , founder and CEO of Vancouver-based , where a version of this piece .

    Photo of the Canadian flag by used under a Creative Commons license.

    POSTED     March 25, 2019, 9:18 a.m.
    Show comments  
    Show tags
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Support for Julia Angwin grows as funders investigate the “coup” at The Markup
    After her ouster as editor-in-chief, multiple funders say they are taking steps to “reassess” their support.
    L’affaire Luminary continues with more podcasts dropping out and allegations of technical bad behavior
    The paid podcast app may well be doing nothing wrong in its hosting of podcasts from the open web — but nonetheless, what they’ve been best at thus far is generating pushback.
    Collaboration jackpot: How three local journalism projects in Europe are getting more bang for their buck
    A case study into local news collaborations in Italy, the U.K., and Finland suggest some methods that any newsroom can use.