• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    The long, complicated, and extremely frustrating history of Medium, 2012–present
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Nov. 6, 2018, 8 a.m.

    The New York Times wants to preface your Election Night panic with some Election Day zen

    Democracy: a single grain of sand slipping through an hourglass.

    If Election 2018 has had a Word of the Year, it might be a to “whataboutism” and au courant rhetorical weapon against those who treat two disparate phenomena as being of comparable importance. (Broadly speaking, whataboutism is a disease native to cable news pundits, while bothsidesism primarily infects newspaper writers.)

    But Election Day has brought the ultimate in bothsidesism from — of course! — The New York Times. Tonight, the paper will drive millions of nervous tappers and clickers insane by bringing back 2016’s bête noire, THE NEEDLE.

    See, you’re tensing up just looking at it, aren’t you?

    Meanwhile, in typical MSM form, The New York Times is trying to have it both ways by allegedly offering a page on the Internet where “Election” is just .

    It even has /self-care/ in the URL.

    It encourages you to share it with your stressed friends lol:

    Really, you can learn all you need to know about The Calm Place from the stock photo credits.


    SO WHICH IS IT NEW YORK TIMES?!?! Do you want hours of white-knuckled existential panic or do you want us to center our qi?

    POSTED     Nov. 6, 2018, 8 a.m.
    Show comments  
    Show tags
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    The long, complicated, and extremely frustrating history of Medium, 2012–present
    “A beautiful space for reading and writing” and pivoting.
    Instead of helping Canadian news startups, a new government subsidy will only prop up failed models
    “We don’t need a handout. But a policy that actively disincentivizes new media outlets from launching and growing to serve the information needs of Canadians is bad policy.”
    Canada’s new journalism subsidies will pick winners and hurt startups
    “The program assumes any subject that doesn’t fit its narrow criteria isn’t worthy of support. It speaks to a fundamental misunderstanding of all the important roles that journalism fills in our lives.”