• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Can you spot a fake photo online? Your level of experience online matters a lot more than contextual clues
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Oct. 2, 2018, 4:34 p.m.
    Reporting & Production

    Why The New York Times TL;DR’d its own 14,218-word Trump investigation

    “It seemed appropriate to do a still not short, but way more digestible, on-the-run version of the story.”

    You could certainly read (14,128 words, by my count) into how Trump’s “self-made” fortune is not only not self-made but also involves tax fraud. But the Times knows that not everybody is going to do that. So on Tuesday afternoon, at the same time that it published the investigation that was a year in the making, it also aggregated itself — publishing “.” The TL;DR version is by the same authors as the full investigation (, , and David Barstow), and, at over 2,500 words, it’s pretty much a longread of its own. There’s also .

    “This is one of the longest stories that we’ve ever run in the news pages of the Times, one of the longest investigative stories we’ve run period,” said Paul Fishleder, who edited the story and who leads the Times’ political investigations unit (). “It’s a big, long, complicated story with many parts, and obviously we hope everyone reads it to the end, but we also know everyone’s not going to read it to the end. It seemed appropriate to do a still not short, but way more digestible, on-the-run version of the story.”

    The Times has other plans to promote the story as well. On Tuesday afternoon, its reporters were , and the Times’ email alert included much of the story’s text.

    The full story will run in (eight pages of) Wednesday’s print paper. As for the decision to publish on Tuesday afternoon, Fishleder said, “Needless to say, with a story this long, you don’t want to run it in the face of the fiercest news cycle, if that’s possible these days. We decided to do it at a time when we felt there was space for it to get maximum attention.”

    POSTED     Oct. 2, 2018, 4:34 p.m.
    SEE MORE ON Reporting & Production
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Can you spot a fake photo online? Your level of experience online matters a lot more than contextual clues
    Whether an image looks like a random Facebook post or part of a New York Times story doesn’t make much of a difference. But your level of experience with the Internet and image editing does.
    Publishers will soon no longer be able to detect when you’re in Chrome’s incognito mode, weakening paywalls everywhere
    A growing number of news sites block incognito readers, figuring they’re probably trying to get around a paywall. But a change from Google will again let people reset their meter with a keystroke.
    R.I.P. Quartz Brief, the innovative mobile news app. Maybe “chatting with the news” isn’t something most people really want to do?
    Just because people like to chat on their phones doesn’t mean they want to chat with you, news organizations.