• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Notifications every 2 minutes: This in-depth look at how people really use WhatsApp shows why fighting fake news there is so hard
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Oct. 29, 2018, 10:18 a.m.
    Business Models

    Hunting for reader revenue, Scroll sets up shop for 2019 with more publishers and $10 million raised

    “The model is designed to reward engagement and loyalty. We think those things are the currency of publishing in the future, that relationship with the consumer. The better you do at that, the better you do under Scroll.”

    With new publishing partners and $7 million more in funding, the TSA-Pre✓-for-Internet-news-consumption startup — led by former executives of Chartbeat, , and — plans to unfurl in 2019’s first quarter.

    characterized Scroll this way last fall, when the startup was one year in: “Talk to people in the news industry about what they think of his new startup Scroll, and they hesitate. They may stumble describing its model. They’ll say it’s something they’re watching. And then they’ll tell you if is behind it, they expect to see something impressive.” So, no pressure — but the team is getting closer to delivering.

    The bet Haile, founding CEO, is making with Scroll is that he can convince online news readers — both subscribers and non-subscribers — to pay $5 a month for a substantially better, ad-free user experience on the news sites they already frequent. If that pitch works, it could send publishers more money than they could generate from advertising revenue.

    “The internet had been this thing that was done to us, not built for us,” Haile told me. Their guiding framework in creating a system for publishers to get their due: “What does the internet that’s built for you look like, feel like, and so forth.”

    Last week, that Scroll had brokered deals with Vox Media, The Daily Beast, and BuzzFeed to bring their sites onto the service. A total of are now signed onto Scroll’s testing phase, joining USA Today, The Atlantic, MSNBC, and more. And Scroll has a serious new infusion of capital to keep it going: Investors, including The New York Times Co. and Axel Springer and led by , have now committed a total of $10 million over the past two years.

    As the media industry focuses on ad-blocking, reader revenue, and data security, Scroll’s ten-person team (planning to grow to 40 by the end of this year) has been spending 2018 constructing its GDPR-compliant infrastructure, negotiating deals, and testing the startup’s model.

    “Nobody has said no” outright, Haile said, of the publishers they’ve approached. But he isn’t measuring by number of publishers; they’re working to add organizations by content consumption coverage, or the top sites where potential Scroll users spend their time. “The consumer doesn’t think about how many sites are in the network, but how much time they get to spend in a better experience,” he said. The split of that consumer’s $5 (or rather, 70 percent of it, after Scroll’s cut) is distributed to publishers based on the amount of time the consumer spends with their site.

    Scroll is one of a few nascent group of startups trying to connect publishers with reader revenue outside the boundaries of a strict subscription, like LaterPay, Blendle, and Invisibly. Scroll’s ad-free experience will be the same for any paying user, though it won’t get you around publisher paywalls. (If you don’t pay for The New York Times, for instance, you won’t get more free articles because you use Scroll — but the ones that you do get will be ad-free.) Scroll will also have to pitch itself to users outside those AndroidForMobile Lab niche types, in addition to publishers, to sign up.

    A significant pull for publishers is Haile’s promise that Scroll can generate more money per user than a typical ad experience. Scroll’s team tested its model based on a group of publishers with $7 billion in digital ad revenue from 234 million unique visitors in a year. “What that means is that cohort of people makes about $2.50/month/person altogether [through ads]. We knew we had to have a distribution pool that was bigger than that,” Haile said. Consumer research on pricing levels showed a substantial number of users willing to pay the $5, with Scroll passing along $3.50 of that.

    Running the publishers’ numbers showed that nearly all organizations could generate 40 percent more than they do from ads, Haile said — all but one. (That site relied on a lot of slideshow-like content that generated quick visits with low engagement.) “The model is designed to reward engagement and loyalty. We think those things are the currency of publishing in the future, that relationship with the consumer. The better you do at that, the better you do under Scroll.”

    While Scroll has been setting up shop, the publishing industry prepared to face off with adblockers and ended up taking more of a data security tack this year. Google’s in-house Chrome adblocker helped and GDPR whipped the Internet into data security shape (extra thanks to a little thing called Cambridge Analytica), but Facebook’s algorithm plot twist and, you know, just the general state of the world has reminded publishers of the urgency to grow reader revenue. Haile sees the moves as steps toward a better Internet world.

    “There’s this newly reinvigorated focus on ‘how do we serve the consumer and put their experience first’,” he said. “Scroll is a symptom of that broader drive to put the consumer back at the heart of what we do as an industry again.”

    Scroll through these about reader revenue beyond the standard subsciption:

    Image of a treasure hunt map on a scroll via used under a Creative Commons license.

    POSTED     Oct. 29, 2018, 10:18 a.m.
    SEE MORE ON Business Models
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Notifications every 2 minutes: This in-depth look at how people really use WhatsApp shows why fighting fake news there is so hard
    “In India, citizens actively seem to be privileging breadth of information over depth…Indians at this moment are not themselves articulating any kind of anxiety about dealing with the flood of information in their phones.”
    Facebook probably didn’t want to be denying it paid people to create fake news this week, but here we are
    Plus: WhatsApp pays for misinformation research and a look at fake midterm-related accounts (“heavy on memes, light on language”).
    How The Wall Street Journal is preparing its journalists to detect deepfakes
    “We have seen this rapid rise in deep learning technology and the question is: Is that going to keep going, or is it plateauing? What’s going to happen next?”