• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Sept. 27, 2018, 6 a.m.
    Audience & Social
    LINK:   |   Posted by: Christine Schmidt   |   September 27, 2018

    Are you more likely to click ?

    or over ?

    At the top of this article or down below, at the bottom?

    We don’t want your finger to cramp so here’s the gist: News site visitors are more likely to make those recirculating taps when stories are grouped in a simply titled Related Stories module rather than a more tongue-twisting section (though we’re still partial to What We’re Reading), when at the bottom of the article (yay for reading finishers, or at least scroll-happy visitors), and when accompanied by images.

    The Center for Media Engagement, which recently tested subscription appeals and trust indicators, with the seven local broadcast newsrooms that comprise . The newsrooms — in Houston, Detroit, Roanoke, San Antonio, Orlando, and two in Jacksonville — participated in A/B testing over one week in March. The researchers studied the first recorded time each unique visitor went to the site, looking at 1.8 million observations total.

    “Among those who first visited the site during the study period, 1.42 percent clicked on a link,” researchers and wrote. “Although this appears to be a low rate of engagement, content distribution sites like Outbrain suggest that healthy clickthrough rates are between 0.10 and 0.25 percent. The results of our study show that links can be designed to generate higher clickthrough rates. In fact, in nearly all instances, it didn’t matter which device was used, the specific news site visited, or even the referral page.”

    The deets:

    • Link layouts containing images generated 63 percent more clicks than those that consisted of only text
    • Links at the end of a page generated 55 percent more clicks than links in the middle of a page
    • Overall, using related content instead of popular content led to a 14 percent increase in clicks
    • Popular content, however, generated more clicks when the referral page was Facebook
    • Generic wording (e.g. Related Stories) generated slightly more clicks than more complex
      wording (e.g. What Else People Can Read on This Topic)
    • It didn’t matter whether people used a smartphone, phablet, tablet, or desktop. It didn’t matter which site users visited. It didn’t matter which page referred them to the site. In all of these instances, there were more clicks when links (1) appeared at the end of articles, and (2) contained images.

    Want to keep recirculating? Here’s a sampling of our click-y archive

     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?
    “It came out of a sense that there were some really important topics with impacts on human beings that didn’t get as much coverage in traditional journalism sections and pieces.”
    Chasing leads and herding cats: How journalism’s latest job title — partner manager — works in ProPublica’s newsroom
    “In short, we came to think that the collaboration itself was something that needed editing.”
    What have tech companies done wrong with fake news? Google (yep) lists the ways
    Plus: A woman-oriented fact-checking initiative, and possible problems with California’s media literacy bill.