• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Sept. 28, 2018, 9:39 a.m.
    Audience & Social

    “Find a way to resist being manipulated.”

    Plus: Twitter, Facebook, and Google sign on to the European Commission’s Code of Practice on Disinformation, and BBC Africa’s investigation into four murders.

    The growing stream of reporting on and data about fake news, misinformation, partisan content, and news literacy is hard to keep up with. This weekly roundup offers the highlights of what you might have missed.

    What we know about Russian interference in the 2016 election: Social media. The New York Times published a on everything we know so far about how the Russians interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. There’s a good section on what they did on social media that serves as a handy summary:

    When Facebook first acknowledged last year the Russian intrusion on its platform, it seemed modest in scale. The $100,000 spent on ads was a trivial sum compared with the tens of millions spent on Facebook by both the Trump and Clinton campaigns.

    But it quickly became clear that the Russians had used a different model for their influence campaign: posting inflammatory messages and relying on free, viral spread. Even by the vertiginous standards of social media, the reach of their effort was impressive: 2,700 fake Facebook accounts, 80,000 posts, many of them elaborate images with catchy slogans, and an eventual audience of on Facebook alone. That was not far short of the who would vote in the 2016 presidential election.

    And Facebook was only the biggest of the engines powering the Russian messages.

    On Instagram, there were that posted 120,000 times and reached about 20 million people. that in the 10 weeks before the election some 3,814 Internet Research Agency accounts interacted with 1.4 million people — and that another 50,258 automated “bot” accounts that the company judged to be Russia-linked tweeted about the election. The trolls created at least , posted Vine videos, blogged on Tumblr, sought donations via PayPal and even exploited the .

    “Clear marking systems and rules for bots.” Twitter, Facebook, and Google, among other companies, signed on to the European Commission’s “” The code isn’t legally binding or anything, so take it for what it is, but a few interesting bits of things the companies are saying they’ll do:

    The EC’s sounding board for the code noted that it’ll be important to actually measure whether the companies are able to do what they say they’re going to do: “While it will be very difficult to assess the overall development of online disinformation, a test case around the European elections could be elaborated. Based on the work of independent factcheckers and academic researchers, regular evaluation of the situation could be carried out.”

    It isn’t enough, for TechCrunch: “If platforms agreeing not to actively impede good faith research in this area is your bar for progress, it’s hard [not] to conclude that it’s being set disturbingly low.”

    Also, on Thursday and Friday, European Parliament is hosting “,” an event in Brussels that you can follow on Twitter .

    “We can say with certainty that the killings happened here.” BBC Africa the murder of two women and two children, closely analyzing video to determine the time and place of the murders and the identity of the killers — Cameroonian soldiers. (Cameroonian government officials had )

    Poynter’s Daniel Funke has .

    Cameroon’s government has not responded to the BBC’s investigation, for Quartz.

    Illustration from L.M. Glackens’ The Yellow Press (1910) via .

    POSTED     Sept. 28, 2018, 9:39 a.m.
    SEE MORE ON Audience & Social
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?
    “It came out of a sense that there were some really important topics with impacts on human beings that didn’t get as much coverage in traditional journalism sections and pieces.”
    Chasing leads and herding cats: How journalism’s latest job title — partner manager — works in ProPublica’s newsroom
    “In short, we came to think that the collaboration itself was something that needed editing.”
    What have tech companies done wrong with fake news? Google (yep) lists the ways
    Plus: A woman-oriented fact-checking initiative, and possible problems with California’s media literacy bill.