• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    The long, complicated, and extremely frustrating history of Medium, 2012–present
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    April 9, 2018, 12:52 p.m.
    Audience & Social

    Facebook and Twitter are opening up a bit to academic researchers, so platforms “can make better decisions”

    A limited group of academics will be given access to some Facebook data.

    At least a few platforms are lifting the curtain a little bit.

    Facebook on Monday, before Congress on Wednesday, that it plans to give a limited group of soon-to-be determined academics some access to Facebook data as needed, with a research emphasis on how Facebook influences elections in different countries around the word.

    “If you’ve followed me for a while, you know one of my top priorities for 2018 [is] making sure Facebook prevents interference and misinformation in elections,” Mark Zuckerberg to promote the new research push (side note: ). “Today we’re taking another step — establishing an independent election research commission that will solicit research on the effects of social media on elections and democracy.”

    The research, which Facebook says will be released publicly and will not be subject to approval by Facebook, is funded through the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, with the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Charles Koch Foundation, Democracy Fund, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, and Omidyar Network. Facebook “.” Hewlett hinted at an emphasis on platform-focused research when it announced $10 million in funding over the next two years devoted to research on disinformation on social media. (Disclosure: AndroidForMobile Lab is supported by the Knight Foundation.)

    “The focus will be entirely forward looking. And our goals are to understand Facebook’s impact on upcoming elections — like Brazil, India, Mexico and the US midterms — and to inform our future product and policy decisions,” wrote Facebook’s VP of communications and public policy Elliot Schrage and its director of research David Ginsberg. “For example, will our current product roadmap effectively fight the spread of misinformation and foreign interference? Specific topics may include misinformation; polarizing content; promoting freedom of expression and association; protecting domestic elections from foreign interference; and civic engagement.”

    The committee of scholars involved will be “international” and represent “different political outlooks.” Facebook will invite scholars based on input from the foundations funding this research committee, and that committee will solicit, evaluate, and set research topics. The research will go through a peer review process, which . Proposals must pass university Institutional Review Board (or “an international equivalent”) review. The announcements don’t mention whether Facebook-owned platforms like WhatsApp or Instagram are included in the datasets that will potentially be granted to researchers.

    A little overshadowed by all this Facebook hubbub has been an about a study researchers Susan Benesch and J. Nathan Matias will lead to find practical solutions to curbing abusive behaviors on Twitter, research that Benesch and Matias themselves proposed to Twitter:

    Today Twitter will begin testing such an idea: that showing an internet platform’s rules to users will improve behavior on that platform. Social norms, which are people’s beliefs about what institutions and other people consider acceptable behavior, powerfully influence what people do and don’t do. Research has shown that when institutions publish rules clearly, people are more likely to follow them. We also have early evidence from Nathan’s research with reddit communities that making policies visible can improve online behavior. In an experiment starting today, Twitter is publicizing its rules, to test whether this improves civility.

    While we’re on this topic: Any academics proposing ?

    Image by , used under a Creative Commons license.

    POSTED     April 9, 2018, 12:52 p.m.
    SEE MORE ON Audience & Social
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    The long, complicated, and extremely frustrating history of Medium, 2012–present
    “A beautiful space for reading and writing” and pivoting.
    Instead of helping Canadian news startups, a new government subsidy will only prop up failed models
    “We don’t need a handout. But a policy that actively disincentivizes new media outlets from launching and growing to serve the information needs of Canadians is bad policy.”
    Canada’s new journalism subsidies will pick winners and hurt startups
    “The program assumes any subject that doesn’t fit its narrow criteria isn’t worthy of support. It speaks to a fundamental misunderstanding of all the important roles that journalism fills in our lives.”