• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Can Facebook beat back the fake news in Ireland’s upcoming vote on abortion?
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    April 2, 2018, 11:18 a.m.
    Reporting & Production
    LINK:   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   April 2, 2018

    Anchors at Sinclair Broadcast Group stations across the country are being required to read a mainstream-media-bashing, Trump-echoing script about “the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country,” as CNN’s Brian Stelter . Over the weekend, Deadspin : “The net result of the company’s current mandate is dozens upon dozens of local news anchors looking like hostages in proof-of-life videos, trying their hardest to spit out words attacking the industry they’d chosen as a life vocation.”

    The right-leaning Sinclair is the largest owner TV news stations in the country; it owns or operates 193 of them, and if the FCC approves its pending takeover of Tribune Media, it will own 40 more. Thirty-seven percent of U.S. adults say they “often” get news from local TV, according to Pew’s most recent research.

    . Taken at face value, the message doesn’t sound particularly troubling. In context, though, Sinclair’s actions seem more insidious. As I wrote about Sinclair last year:

    Sinclair has long been labeled a conservative company that pushes its ideology on its audience — a label it resists.

    In 2004, its leadership reportedly ordered all of its local stations to air an anti–John Kerry documentary; Jon Leiberman, a D.C. bureau chief who resisted, . The local stations — and if a goes through, there will be more than 200 of them — are . In April, it , a former Trump spokesman, as its . (He has as part of the House Russia probe.) Some see Sinclair as a rising competitor to Fox News, which its “Fair and Balanced” slogan. (David Smith, who was CEO of Sinclair until January, : “There are two companies doing truly balanced news today: Sinclair and Fox.”) Just last week, campaign finance records showed that a Sinclair executive to Greg Gianforte the day after the Montana Republican bodyslammed a Guardian reporter — not something you might expect from a media company executive.

    “I feel bad because [viewers] are seeing these people they’ve trusted for decades tell them things they know are essentially propaganda,” one local anchor .

    “The critics are now upset about our well-researched journalistic initiative focused on fair and objective reporting,” Sinclair SVP Scott Livingston (published on CNN) Monday. “For the record, the stories we are referencing in this campaign are the unsubstantiated ones (i.e. fake/false) like ‘Pope Endorses Trump’ which move quickly across social media and result in an ill-informed public. Some other false stories, like the false ‘Pizzagate’ story, can result in dangerous consequences.”

    And if you’re thinking “why don’t they just quit…” Thread:

    Meanwhile, a from Emory’s and suggests that local news stations’ coverage changes after Sinclair buys them: National politics coverage increases, “largely at the expense of coverage of local politics,” and the stations’ ideological slant shifts to the right.

    Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Can Facebook beat back the fake news in Ireland’s upcoming vote on abortion?
    Plus: What people who like fact-checking are like, a new “digital deception” newsletter, and Facebook expands its fact-checking partnerships beyond the West.
    R Vision, a digital news outlet by and for Rohingya people, aims to shed light on crisis
    R Vision is run entirely by an ethnic Rohingya staff of about 25 and uses local citizen journalists to get news out from areas where media is denied access.
    Should you design for addiction or for loyalty?
    That depends on whether you want users or an audience.