The year of The Washington Post

“My real bet, though, is that the battle between the Times and the Post is being waged most when it comes to their rival international and national expansions. And the winner of that struggle is too close to call.”

The contemporary newspaper war between The Washington Post and The New York Times began as a traffic war, with the Post topping the Times in 2015 for . The next battle may well be for digital subscriptions, but looking to other measures of dominance beyond just bottom-line revenue is also important to predicting the future success of either paper. These are soft factors that may well matter to those determining which brand to be loyal to for the duration of the new administration. My prediction for 2018 is that this it is the year of The Washington Post.

  • The Washington Post appears to be fighting Trump; the Times appears (to some) to be normalizing hate.
  • “Democracy Dies in Darkness” is actually an old Post saying (via Bob Woodward) and . But try telling that to a public of readers primed for content that bolsters their arguments for (or against) the president. The subtlety of saying the new motto comes from a pre-Watergate First Amendment case is easy to miss. The Post says it isn’t jonesing for a fight with Trump, but its opinion pages would beg to disagree, and members of the public are likely to interpret the slogan as anti-Trump. James O’Keefe did make one point with his “expose” — that even Post reporters acknowledge that some perceive the newspaper as anti-Trump because of its aggressive editorial position.

    The Post, intentionally or not, has done well to position itself as different from the more milquetoast Times, which has gotten significant pushback from readers for being overly kind to intolerant voices (see for one example). It didn’t help the Times’ case when Dean Baquet brushed aside readers’ concerns about a profile of a Nazi many considered normalizing as a “.” Note to both publications for 2018: You can’t play Nazis down the middle.

    Note that neither Marty Baron nor Baquet would say they see their newspapers as the opposition. (As , “We’re not at war with the administration, we’re at work.”) In fact, judging from Marvin Kalb conducted with them, these editors would see their newsrooms as not having opinions at all. That said, when a Post reporter wins a Pulitzer in part by crowdsourcing his efforts to an audience hoping to stick it to Trump, it’s hard to see claims to perfect impartiality as anything other than outdated.

  • The Washington Post is a software company; the Times isn’t.
  • The Post’s Arc publishing platform is the best demonstration of its software prowess. Sales are going to major companies abroad (such as Canada’s Globe and Mail) and at home (the Los Angeles Times). The Post considers its software team as among the best in the business and says it’s able to attract top talent thanks to the Bezos association. Arc-driven sites boast superfast load times and the system is modular, meaning that news organizations can readily customize the product to its own needs. Combine that with other editorial innovations, such as annotations, adoption of commenting platforms via The Coral Project, and frequent A/B testing, and you’ve got some advantages that come from a new infusion of smart engineers and product managers, along with existing staff empowered to experiment.

    The Times also has many reader-facing innovations. It’s experimenting with personalization, has had great success with The Daily podcast, and is finally trying to open up most of its articles to commenting thanks to AI rather than engage in various forms of pre-moderation.

    As of now, though, the Times hasn’t to my knowledge put forward software it can sell to others. In fact, , perhaps best known for a haptic news mirror and a visual “cascade” that showed how stories spread on social media, was shut down in 2016. As an occasional visitor to the lab, let me tell you that walking into the place felt different than the rest of the newsroom: Something about it made you believe that within this small room lay the future of The New York Times.

    , and while talent moves around in all newsrooms with regularity, some names who have left since roughly 2014 and 2017 include digital leaders in the news and tech industry: Aron Pilhofer, Derek Willis, Jacob Harris, Andrew DeVigal, Alexis Lloyd, and Amy O’Leary, among others. There’s no question that working at the Times still holds tremendous cachet, but those mentioned above were huge losses.

  • The Post is playing with platforms; the Times is bowing out.
  • The Times bowed out of Facebook’s Instant Articles in , noting limited returns from the platform. The Post has stayed, doubling doubled down on playing with Facebook; it will be is including in a subscription experiment.

    There’s also a question of tone on social media platforms that could have long-term effects on reader loyalty. The Washington Post’s playful Reddit is perfectly on point with the platform. The New York Times’ Snapchat efforts often include (in a post from April 2017, a Snapchat crossword is promised as a reward for going through the trouble to subscribe to its feed). And the Times’ new social media guidelines limit the ability of its journalists to comment on their stories or news developments, which may be precisely the kind of assistance and orientation readers are hoping to get from their favorite journalists. Note there is , though some exceptions may be allowed. This retro attitude is akin to the publish-first-in-the-newspaper-then-online-later debate of the early 2010s.

  • The Post is getting a little extra romance these days.
  • 2015’s Spotlight has had a profound effect on future journalists, at least as far as I can tell from the students who show up in my classroom. Incoming this year is The Post with Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep. As the Times itself acknowledges,

    The Times is no stranger to the movie treatment, of course, though Page One came out back in 2011. While the movie cemented David Carr’s place in journalism history, today it must be watched as a piece of the past. The Post is “inspired by true events” decades old, but the portrayal of investigative reporting into administration secrets shows the value of journalism and gives it a taste of contemporary relevance. Sadly, the Times doesn’t get much of a nod in the movie, though the newspaper was also critical to unmasking the Pentagon Papers and was the named plaintiff in the 1971 Supreme Court decision that paved the way for the full publication of the investigation. Hollywood, however, comes down in favor of The Post in The Post in 2018.

  • The Times still leads in live events; the Post’s remain D.C.-centric.
  • Across the U.S., The Times is sponsoring live events that touch on news related events and local knowledge in ways that the Post has not yet begun doing. This is a huge opportunity to reach loyal readers — people willing to pay to see their favorite writers in the flesh. In D.C., a recent Times Talk featured a whisky tasting and a chat about feminism; in L.A., a Times Talk with Ashley Judd and Jodi Kantor, among others, considered sexual harassment; for students, The Times hosted a Times Talk virtual watch party with Trevor Noah this year. While the Post’s space for live events looks oddly like the Times’ digs, so far, the Post has mainly focused on in-town events such as a Gretchen Carlson book signing (though it was livestreamed).

My real bet, though, is that the battle between the Times and the Post is being waged most when it comes to their rival international and national expansions. And the winner of that struggle is too close to call. The Post has gone to pains to note that . Its bundling partnership with Amazon Prime has given the Post a huge opportunity, as has its partnerships with hundreds of local newspapers who offer a Post digital subscription along with their own. On the other hand, the Times’ national and international expansion involves putting people from the places that they hope to expand in charge of content; California Today notes that its curators are actually from California, while hiring and expansion in Australia and Canada . While I’m deeply nostalgic for The International Herald Tribune and global.nytimes.com, which provided a global editorial lens instead of a New York-centric one, cutting costs in Europe and centralizing news production in London makes the Times more nimble, especially digitally. The Times also already has and a which may propel global audiences to subscribe.

We’ll see what comes of the ultimate race between the Post and the Times — but for the year ahead, I’m putting my bets on The Post.

is an assistant professor at the George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs.

Raju Narisetti   Mirror, mirror on the wall

Sarah Marshall   Loyalty as the key performance indicator

Joyce Barnathan   It will be harder to bury the news

Cindy Royal   Your journalism curriculum is obsolete

Corey Johnson   The pro-fact resistance

Julia B. Chan   Looking for loyalty in all the right places

Mary Walter-Brown   Show a little vulnerability

Mira Lowe   The year of the local watchdog

Ariana Tobin   Too tired to tap

Francesco Marconi   The year of machine-to-machine journalism

Jesse Holcomb   Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you

Yvonne Leow   The rise of video messaging

Paul Ford   Go global

Sara M. Watson   Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters

Lam Thuy Vo   Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest

Lucas Graves   From algorithms to institutions

Mario García   Storytelling finally adapts to mobile

Ray Soto   VR reaches the next level

Charo Henríquez   Training is an investment, not an expense

Edward Roussel   Eyes, ears, and brains

Mi-Ai Parrish   Blockchain and trust

Kinsey Wilson   Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Publishing less to give readers more

Jake Levine   The return to now

S. Mitra Kalita   The arc of news and audience

Julia Beizer   A longer view on the pivot

Rodney Benson   Better, less read, and less trusted

Alan Soon   The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media

Nushin Rashidian   Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives

Andrew Ramsammy   The year ownership mattered

Feli Sánchez   The year for guerrilla user research

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity

Tamar Charney   We get serious about algorithms

Rachel Schallom   Better design helps differentiate opinion and news

Amie Ferris-Rotman   More female reporters abroad (please)

Nancy Watzman   Know thy TV

Doris Truong   Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes

Jennifer Choi   Standing up for us and for each other

Tim Carmody   Watch out for Spotify

Taylor Lorenz   Social and media will split

L. Gordon Crovitz   Serving readers over advertisers

Jacqui Cheng   Retailers move into content

Jim Moroney   Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for

Matt Carlson   Attacks on the press will get worse

Alice Antheaume   Are you fluent in AI?

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Seeking trust in fragmented spaces

Caitria O'Neill   The new court of public opinion

Dan Shanoff   You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)

Jassim Ahmad   Thriving on change

Kyle Ellis   Let’s build our way out of this

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms

John Keefe   Scooped by AI

Rick Berke   Value is the watchword

Marie Gilot   No assholes allowed

Steve Grove   The midterms are an opportunity

Molly de Aguiar   Good journalism won’t be enough

Renée Kaplan   The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)

Brian Lam   Sketchy ethics around product reviews

Nicholas Quah   Stop talking trash about young people

Dannagal G. Young   Stop covering politics as a game

Elizabeth Jensen   Show your work

Jarrod Dicker   Honesty in advertising

Joanne McNeil   Gatekeeping the gatekeepers

Tanzina Vega   It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic

Emma Carew Grovum   Newsroom culture becomes a priority

Carlos Martínez de la Serna   The new journalism commons

Matt Thompson   Here come the attention managers

Eric Nuzum   Beyond the narrative arc

Caitlin Thompson   Podcasting models mature and diversify

Borja Echevarría   TV goes digital, digital goes TV

Juliette De Maeyer   A responsible press criticism

Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy   Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism

Corey Ford   The empire strikes back

Monika Bauerlein   The firehose of falsehood

Matt Boggie   The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea

Michael Kuntz   The only pivot that might work

Raney Aronson-Rath   Transparency is the antidote to fake news

Amy Webb   Listen to weak signals

P. Kim Bui   The reckoning is only beginning

Almar Latour   Conquering calm

Kelsey Proud   No, no, no

Sam Sanders   Shine the light on ourselves

Kristen Muller   The year of the voter

Basile Simon   We need better career paths for news nerds

Dan Newman   A return to trust

Imaeyen Ibanga   Longform video leads the way

Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán   The editorial meeting of the future

Tracie Powell   The muting of underserved voices

Umbreen Bhatti   The trust problem isn’t new

Sydette Harry   Listen to your corner and watch for the hook

Jim Brady   With the people, not just of the people

Mary Meehan   Real lives are at stake in rural areas

Rachel Davis Mersey   AI, with real smarts

Zizi Papacharissi   Women come back

Matt DeRienzo   A recession, then a collapse

Vivian Schiller   Pivot to tomorrow

Monique Judge   Letting black women tell their own stories

Miguel Castro   The arrival of the impact producer

Vanessa K. DeLuca   Women’s voices take center stage

Errin Haines Whack   At the ballot, it’s time to count black women

Ståle Grut   Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks

Emily Goligoski   Looking beyond news for inspiration

Tanya Cordrey   Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention

Jamie Mottram   From pageviews to t-shirts

Alastair Coote   The year of self-improvement

Michelle Garcia   Navigating journalistic transparency

Justin Kosslyn   The year journalists become digital security experts

Jessica Parker Gilbert   Design connects storytelling and strategy

Mariana Moura Santos   Think local, act global

Sue Schardt   Jump the niche

Eric Ulken   The year local publishers get smart(er) about change

Carrie Brown-Smith   Transparency finally takes off

Rodney Gibbs   Tech workers turn to journalism

C.W. Anderson   The social media apocalypse

Joanne Lipman   Journalists inventing revenue streams

Alexios Mantzarlis   Moving fake news research out of the lab

Will Sommer   The year local media gets conservative

Nathalie Malinarich   Peak push

Burt Herman   Things get real

Hossein Derakhshan   Television has won

Craig Newmark   Working together toward sustainable solutions

Sam Ford   The year of investing in processes

Andrew Haeg   The year journalists become relationship builders

Jennifer Coogan   The future is female

Federica Cherubini   The rise of bridge roles in news organizations

Niketa Patel   Live journalism comes of age

Christopher Meighan   Passive partnership is in the rearview

Daniel Trielli   The rich get richer, the poor scramble

Cory Haik   Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact

Aron Pilhofer   We can’t leave the business to the business side any more

Debra Adams Simmons   And a woman shall lead them

Rubina Madan Fillion   Unlocking the potential of AI

An Xiao Mina   Memes and visuals come to the fore

Nikki Usher   The year of The Washington Post

Dheerja Kaur   Fun with subscription products

José Zamora   Revenue-first journalism

Jared Newman   Venture funding and digital news don’t mix

Andrew Losowsky   The year of resilience

Alfred Hermida   Going beyond mobile-first

Frédéric Filloux   External forces

Mike Caulfield   Refactoring media literacy for the networked age

Luke O'Neil   The end is already here

Mariano Blejman   News games rule

Kim Fox   Audience teams diversify their approach

Pablo Boczkowski   The rise of skeptical reading

Richard J. Tofel   The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention

David Skok   Finding an information-life balance

Laura E. Davis   Writing answers before you know the question

Adam Thomas   Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time

Usha Sahay   Wallets get opened

Kathleen McElroy   Building a news video experience native to mobile

Pete Brown   Push alerts, personalized

Helen Havlak   Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds

Hannah Cassius   The year of the echo-chamber escapists

Claire Wardle   Disinformation gets worse

Damon Krukowski   Reviving the alt-weekly soul

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   Skepticism and narcissism

Heather Bryant   Building the ecosystems for collaboration

Michelle Ferrier   The year of the great reckoning

Bill Keller   A growing turn to philanthropy

Manoush Zomorodi   Self-help as a publishing strategy

Amy King   Let’s amplify visual voice

Cristina Wilson   The year of the Instagram Story

Felix Salmon   Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin

Pia Frey   Address users as individuals

Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg   (Hint: It’s about your brand)

Susie Banikarim   R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)

Evie Nagy   Pivot to mobile video frustration

Ruth Palmer   Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities

Neha Gandhi   Filler killers

Lanre Akinola   Making noise is not a strategy

Sally Lehrman   Trust comes first

Mandy Velez   texting is lit rn, fam

Kawandeep Virdee   Zines had it right all along

Trushar Barot   The Jio-fication of India

www.teplostar.kiev.ua

www.220km.com.ua

https://karter-kiev.net