The editorial meeting of the future

“In the future, we’ll instead organize the editorial meeting around this all-important question: “What can we help the public understand or do today?” We won’t start with our ideas — we’ll start with the information gaps the public demonstrates they have, and focus our efforts squarely on filling those gaps.”

Newsrooms are up against a life-or-death mix of maladies: public distrust, dialogue breakdown, platform disruption, disinformation and the fact that everyone is getting completely different information. We’re all looking for a cure. But what if the symptoms of all these ills can trace their root causes to inside of our own house? On other words: what if it’s not “them” to blame, it’s us?

So much of this dysfunction starts in the way we run our editorial meetings. So as a starting point, let’s imagine how fixing those critically important meetings can also fix our other underlying illnesses.

Organizing mindset

In today’s editorial meeting, we organize everything around the content production line: the so-called “beasts to feed.” The unit we produce is the story and we focus everything around how to make enough of them fill all of the containers and platforms — online, on-air, on social, on mobile, on watches, and on and on.

In the future, we’ll instead organize the editorial meeting around this all-important question: “What can we help the public understand or do today?” We won’t start with our ideas — we’ll start with the information gaps the public demonstrates they have, and focus our efforts squarely on filling those gaps.

Where story ideas come from

These days when we’re out of personal ideas for stories, we get our inspiration by obsessing over what the competitor across town is reporting, or from whatever’s picking up steam on the Internet, or from the PR professionals and officials whose very job it is to get us to pay attention to them

In the future, what we cover will be shaped directly by our communities. It will be part of our routine to ask the public directly: “what don’t you know about ______ that you’d like us to investigate?” And we’ll come to learn that the public does not ask for pet videos or personal grudge stories when invited to shape coverage. We’ll recognize them as insightful, curious people whose questions result in , , stories, that end up and .

How we decide what gets covered

Currently, we decide what gets covered by assuming that because we’re professionals we know exactly what to report (good old “editorial judgment”). Never mind the fact that journalists are overwhelmingly one gender, one race, one class and have little in common with many of the people we cover and are aiming to serve.

In the future, we’ll be in constant conversation with the public to learn what information they need. We’ll invite them to , we’ll visit the spaces where communities gather and just observe and listen (even without a notebook!), and and discuss what’s going on and . It will be natural for reporters to pitch stories knowing the name and face of the person who brought this curiosity to light.

How we deploy resources

Nowadays we report at all hours for months on end, keeping our progress hidden so nobody steals our amazing ideas. This is just how we work, and also how we drive ourselves to burnout. But do we have to?

In the editorial meeting of the future, we’ll ask “who outside of the newsroom can help us with the story?” before we even start reporting. When Vermont Public Radio wanted to tackle the across Vermont, they invited their audience to share photos (and addresses!) of barns that were in rough shape. When the Australian Broadcasting Company’s Canberra bureau was investigating , members of its audience joined the reporters for a fact-finding workshop to dig through documents. ProPublica also does a consistent, excellent job of involving its audience in the reporting process for .

Our sources

Journalists have their go-to experts — people they’ve built relationships with over decades, and yes, they’re smart! But it turns out that many of those cultivated folks are white men. Which means we’re missing every other perspective.

In the future, we’ll start with those living and feeling the concerns and anxieties our reporting addresses. Like how after Hurricane Harvey to those looking for aid. And WBEZ to talk about racial divides within their mosques. The story even ended up spawning designed by the interviewees after the reporting.

How we judge “success”

But how do we know our grueling, often thankless work is actually working? These days we measure by what gets the most clicks, time on site, awards, or scoops our competitors. Our business models still demand it, and so apparently do our egos.

But in the future, we’ll track our progress against this measure: “Did the people we serve accomplish their goals?” (thanks !). And we’ll learn the answers to that by creating more paths to get direct, actionable public feedback to understand if, and how well, we’re hitting the mark.

We’ll start to walk back the obsession with quantitative performance measurements of our work and balance it with better qualitative feedback.

How we judge ourselves

These days we analyze the audience way more than we analyze ourselves.

But in the future we’ll have the technology, ability and motivation to track who in our own editorial meetings speaks the most, gets their ideas approved the most often. We’ll look to the data to make sure we’re not favoring the usual suspects and that we’re giving others a fair shot at representation.

And we’ll also track whether or not the meta story our organizations is telling is accurate. If women make up more than half of the population, but analysis shows our stories , we’ll recognize that we’re actually distorting reality, not reflecting it. Same goes for if the majority of stories we hear about one demographic or neighborhood is . With the help of data analysis applied to ourselves, we’ll become aware of how our power dynamics play out, and how we contribute to stoking fear and warping the public’s sense of the world.

How we will survive

Our success will depend on becoming essential to those we aim to serve. We’ll know it if the public feels invested in our work by contributing their insights, questions and ideas. We’ll know it if they respond when we ask them to subscribe or donate to keep us going.

And we’ll know if we’re headed in the right direction by measuring how well we responded to the public. Did we show respect and appreciation for their contributions, did we answer their questions, did we show up when and where they needed us?

The bad news in all of this: changing our editorial meetings will be hard, because changing habits and culture is hard. The good news is that we, not the platforms, not the Macedonian fake news factories, not public officials, not advertisers, actually have the power and authority to do it.

So will this prediction for a new editorial framework ever come to pass, and if so, when? You tell me.

is CEO of . is cofounder and editor of .

Edward Roussel   Eyes, ears, and brains

Sam Sanders   Shine the light on ourselves

Imaeyen Ibanga   Longform video leads the way

Mariana Moura Santos   Think local, act global

Dannagal G. Young   Stop covering politics as a game

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity

Nancy Watzman   Know thy TV

Molly de Aguiar   Good journalism won’t be enough

Christopher Meighan   Passive partnership is in the rearview

Cindy Royal   Your journalism curriculum is obsolete

Charo Henríquez   Training is an investment, not an expense

Mi-Ai Parrish   Blockchain and trust

Matt DeRienzo   A recession, then a collapse

Sam Ford   The year of investing in processes

Luke O'Neil   The end is already here

Debra Adams Simmons   And a woman shall lead them

Sara M. Watson   Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters

Bill Keller   A growing turn to philanthropy

Marie Gilot   No assholes allowed

Aron Pilhofer   We can’t leave the business to the business side any more

Frédéric Filloux   External forces

Mandy Velez   texting is lit rn, fam

David Skok   Finding an information-life balance

Raney Aronson-Rath   Transparency is the antidote to fake news

Ariana Tobin   Too tired to tap

S. Mitra Kalita   The arc of news and audience

Rick Berke   Value is the watchword

Neha Gandhi   Filler killers

Pia Frey   Address users as individuals

Amie Ferris-Rotman   More female reporters abroad (please)

Alexios Mantzarlis   Moving fake news research out of the lab

Basile Simon   We need better career paths for news nerds

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Publishing less to give readers more

Tanzina Vega   It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic

Kim Fox   Audience teams diversify their approach

Federica Cherubini   The rise of bridge roles in news organizations

Dan Newman   A return to trust

Alice Antheaume   Are you fluent in AI?

Lucas Graves   From algorithms to institutions

Matt Boggie   The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea

Nikki Usher   The year of The Washington Post

Elizabeth Jensen   Show your work

Damon Krukowski   Reviving the alt-weekly soul

Kinsey Wilson   Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up

Sally Lehrman   Trust comes first

Jake Levine   The return to now

Errin Haines Whack   At the ballot, it’s time to count black women

Trushar Barot   The Jio-fication of India

Dan Shanoff   You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)

Laura E. Davis   Writing answers before you know the question

Michael Kuntz   The only pivot that might work

Ståle Grut   Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks

Monika Bauerlein   The firehose of falsehood

Jessica Parker Gilbert   Design connects storytelling and strategy

Ray Soto   VR reaches the next level

Rodney Benson   Better, less read, and less trusted

Helen Havlak   Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds

Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán   The editorial meeting of the future

Emma Carew Grovum   Newsroom culture becomes a priority

Adam Thomas   Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor

Jennifer Choi   Standing up for us and for each other

Jacqui Cheng   Retailers move into content

Nicholas Quah   Stop talking trash about young people

Justin Kosslyn   The year journalists become digital security experts

Joanne McNeil   Gatekeeping the gatekeepers

Cory Haik   Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact

Hannah Cassius   The year of the echo-chamber escapists

Amy King   Let’s amplify visual voice

Jennifer Coogan   The future is female

José Zamora   Revenue-first journalism

Doris Truong   Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes

Burt Herman   Things get real

Renée Kaplan   The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)

Nathalie Malinarich   Peak push

Daniel Trielli   The rich get richer, the poor scramble

Michelle Ferrier   The year of the great reckoning

Matt Thompson   Here come the attention managers

Borja Echevarría   TV goes digital, digital goes TV

Umbreen Bhatti   The trust problem isn’t new

Alan Soon   The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media

Mary Meehan   Real lives are at stake in rural areas

Will Sommer   The year local media gets conservative

Taylor Lorenz   Social and media will split

Ruth Palmer   Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities

Eric Ulken   The year local publishers get smart(er) about change

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms

Joyce Barnathan   It will be harder to bury the news

Eric Nuzum   Beyond the narrative arc

Tim Carmody   Watch out for Spotify

Tanya Cordrey   Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention

Emily Goligoski   Looking beyond news for inspiration

Andrew Losowsky   The year of resilience

Joanne Lipman   Journalists inventing revenue streams

Feli Sánchez   The year for guerrilla user research

Tamar Charney   We get serious about algorithms

Kathleen McElroy   Building a news video experience native to mobile

Corey Johnson   The pro-fact resistance

Juliette De Maeyer   A responsible press criticism

Julia B. Chan   Looking for loyalty in all the right places

Monique Judge   Letting black women tell their own stories

Jim Moroney   Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for

Zizi Papacharissi   Women come back

Jarrod Dicker   Honesty in advertising

Kelsey Proud   No, no, no

Vanessa K. DeLuca   Women’s voices take center stage

Cristina Wilson   The year of the Instagram Story

Matt Carlson   Attacks on the press will get worse

P. Kim Bui   The reckoning is only beginning

An Xiao Mina   Memes and visuals come to the fore

Rachel Davis Mersey   AI, with real smarts

Lanre Akinola   Making noise is not a strategy

Mike Caulfield   Refactoring media literacy for the networked age

Alfred Hermida   Going beyond mobile-first

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Seeking trust in fragmented spaces

Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg   (Hint: It’s about your brand)

Sarah Marshall   Loyalty as the key performance indicator

Caitlin Thompson   Podcasting models mature and diversify

Dheerja Kaur   Fun with subscription products

Heather Bryant   Building the ecosystems for collaboration

Nushin Rashidian   Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives

Craig Newmark   Working together toward sustainable solutions

Yvonne Leow   The rise of video messaging

Brian Lam   Sketchy ethics around product reviews

Carrie Brown-Smith   Transparency finally takes off

Michelle Garcia   Navigating journalistic transparency

Hossein Derakhshan   Television has won

Kyle Ellis   Let’s build our way out of this

Raju Narisetti   Mirror, mirror on the wall

Andrew Haeg   The year journalists become relationship builders

Alastair Coote   The year of self-improvement

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   Skepticism and narcissism

Mary Walter-Brown   Show a little vulnerability

Claire Wardle   Disinformation gets worse

Pablo Boczkowski   The rise of skeptical reading

Miguel Castro   The arrival of the impact producer

Amy Webb   Listen to weak signals

Andrew Ramsammy   The year ownership mattered

Jamie Mottram   From pageviews to t-shirts

Corey Ford   The empire strikes back

Usha Sahay   Wallets get opened

Manoush Zomorodi   Self-help as a publishing strategy

Francesco Marconi   The year of machine-to-machine journalism

Susie Banikarim   R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)

Carlos Martínez de la Serna   The new journalism commons

Almar Latour   Conquering calm

Tracie Powell   The muting of underserved voices

Mira Lowe   The year of the local watchdog

Pete Brown   Push alerts, personalized

Felix Salmon   Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin

Julia Beizer   A longer view on the pivot

Jared Newman   Venture funding and digital news don’t mix

Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy   Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism

Caitria O'Neill   The new court of public opinion

Mariano Blejman   News games rule

Vivian Schiller   Pivot to tomorrow

John Keefe   Scooped by AI

Paul Ford   Go global

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time

Steve Grove   The midterms are an opportunity

Mario García   Storytelling finally adapts to mobile

Jesse Holcomb   Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you

Niketa Patel   Live journalism comes of age

Rachel Schallom   Better design helps differentiate opinion and news

Richard J. Tofel   The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention

Jassim Ahmad   Thriving on change

Sydette Harry   Listen to your corner and watch for the hook

Rodney Gibbs   Tech workers turn to journalism

C.W. Anderson   The social media apocalypse

Kawandeep Virdee   Zines had it right all along

Rubina Madan Fillion   Unlocking the potential of AI

Sue Schardt   Jump the niche

Lam Thuy Vo   Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest

Evie Nagy   Pivot to mobile video frustration

L. Gordon Crovitz   Serving readers over advertisers

Jim Brady   With the people, not just of the people

Kristen Muller   The year of the voter

суррогатное материнство цена