• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Oct. 25, 2017, 1:04 p.m.
    Reporting & Production
    LINK:   |   Posted by: Ricardo Bilton   |   October 25, 2017

    To ferret out some of the many bots on Twitter that push out political opinions, Quartz has created a bot of its own.

    , is designed to search Twitter for accounts that are heavily focused on political topics. These accounts are fed into a tool called , which uses machine learning to determine the probability that an account is assisted by or run exclusively by a bot. Quartz has already used the tool to classify over thirty accounts, many of which have tweeted hundreds of thousands of times and have thousands of followers. One bot that Quartz’s bot identified, for example, has tweeted or has been retweeted 1.14 million times since April. for all the accounts that @probabot_ has identified as bots.

    The bot’s launch is timely given the ongoing investigation into Twitter’s role in Russia’s campaign to influence the 2016 presidential election. Twitter estimates that false and spam accounts represent less than 5 percent of its monthly active user base. that its automated systems flag more than 3.2 million suspicious accounts per week, but @probabot_ shows that not even Twitter is able to spot them all.

    @probabot_ is part of an ongoing effort by Quartz to use bots to both inform the site’s reporting and break news. _ransombot, an earlier project, was first to spot when the hackers behind the WannaCry ransom bot cashed out the bitcoin accounts victims had to pay into before regaining access to their machines. Both efforts were created by , a technology reporter at Quartz, who said that Quartz plans to use the bot’s early results to tweak its parameters and improve results in the future.

    Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?
    “It came out of a sense that there were some really important topics with impacts on human beings that didn’t get as much coverage in traditional journalism sections and pieces.”
    Chasing leads and herding cats: How journalism’s latest job title — partner manager — works in ProPublica’s newsroom
    “In short, we came to think that the collaboration itself was something that needed editing.”
    What have tech companies done wrong with fake news? Google (yep) lists the ways
    Plus: A woman-oriented fact-checking initiative, and possible problems with California’s media literacy bill.