• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Bad news from Mashable, BuzzFeed, and Vice shows times are rough for ad-supported digital media
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    March 24, 2017, 10:36 a.m.
    Audience & Social

    Is it still fake news if it makes you feel good? (Yes, yes it is): Updates from the fake news world

    Plus: LinkedIn claims it doesn’t have a fake news problem, Facebook’s “disputed story” alerts are spotted in the wild, and middle schoolers get trained to be skeptical.

    The growing stream of reporting on and data about fake news, misinformation, partisan content, and news literacy is hard to keep up with. This weekly roundup offers the highlights of what you might have missed.

    Feel-good fake news: Following Wednesday’s terrorist attack in London, an image of a Tube sign has gone viral:

    It’s fake, a Photoshop job (), but The Verge’s notes that people including politicians and journalists are arguing that that doesn’t really matter: “Sky News presenter Kay Burley tweeted the sign this morning, then followed up by : ‘For the avoidance of doubt this is a computer generated sign but nevertheless a sentiment shared by millions.’ BBC Radio 4 presenter Nick Robinson out live on air this morning, but later : ‘Well, you learn something every day. That lovely tube sign might be ‘fake’ but the sentiment isn’t for thousands sharing it’…the idea that sentiment is more important than veracity seems to be widespread, with plenty of people — again, including journalists — saying that ‘fact-checking’ the sign is ‘missing the point.'”

    In the comments of The Verge’s post, readers debated whether fake news is the same thing as a meme and ; some argued that the sign and . One thought: I wouldn’t actually qualify this (fake) sign as apolitical; it’s feel-good but carries a broader message in support of the multiculturalism of London, somewhat akin to in New York City following Trump’s election, and it is essentially the kind of sentiment that in a tweet Wednesday.

    Facebook’s fake news alerts spotted in the wild: Facebook announced back in December that it was partnering with fact-checking organizations to clamp down on viral fake news; three months later, users began spotting the system in action when they tried to share a story called “The Irish Slave Trade — The Slaves That Time Forgot,” published by a blog called Newport Buzz. Guardian staffers attempted to share the story on Facebook in various regions, : “Attempts by the Guardian in San Francisco to publish the Newport Buzz story triggered the tool, but not in Sydney or London.” Quartz’s notes if you want to post the story (in an area where the fact-checking feature is turned on).

    A value of $25!

    A post shared by Oxford Pennant (@oxfordpennant) on

    LinkedIn claims it has no fake news problem: “People come to LinkedIn for a reason. Whatever it is they’re doing in their professional world is what they want to talk about. That alone rules out a lot of what would constitute ‘fake news.’ This is not the place where you post conspiracy theories about a pizza chain,” LinkedIn editor-in-chief Dan Roth while promoting the company’s . Gizmodo’s : “A quick search on LinkedIn reveals no shortage of posts about the DC pizza parlor’s supposed child-trafficking proclivities…Fake news hasn’t been a major problem for LinkedIn, so an initiative to solve this complicated issue through a new feature is at best disingenuous — because LinkedIn is, by in large, not a destination for most people to get news from.”

    Dr. Fraud: 48 out of 360 academic journals accepted a fake application for a fake editor, a team out of Poland’s University of Wrocław found, . The New Yorker’s , which have been enabled by the rise of the Internet. Jeffrey Beall, an associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado, Denver, attempted to keep a list of these spam journals from 2011 until this year: “In late January he , for reasons he preferred not to elaborate on. ‘There was pressure from my university to stop,’ he said. ‘Universities don’t like negative things; they like happy, smiling people, not a lot of politics. I kind of feared for my job.'” (Earlier.)

    “Someone could just be jumping through a roof and landing on a trampoline.” The New York Times profiled a Brooklyn middle school for online content. “You’re living in a different world than we grew up in,” one teacher told her seventh graders. The curriculum was inspired by the news literacy program at . But “introducing this at the university level is way, way too late,” , the dean at Stony Brook’s journalism school, told the Times’ . “The ideal time is middle school, he said, when students are Internet-savvy but not yet immersed in social media.”

    Illustration from L.M. Glackens’ The Yellow Press (1910) via .

    POSTED     March 24, 2017, 10:36 a.m.
    SEE MORE ON Audience & Social
    PART OF A SERIES     Real News About Fake News
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
    Show comments  
    Show tags
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Bad news from Mashable, BuzzFeed, and Vice shows times are rough for ad-supported digital media
    The rapid growth of Google and Facebook continues to take its toll on digital media companies.
    Asking members to support its journalism (no prizes, no swag), The Guardian raises more reader revenue than ad dollars
    The Guardian revamped its ask and its membership offerings — moving from 12,000 members in the beginning of 2016 to 300,000 today.
    Beating the 404 death knell: Singapore news startups struggle to cover costs and find their footing
    Political news reporting doesn’t seem to be holding up well as a business in the city-state. And it’s even harder when you’re seen as “alternative” media.