• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    If you’re poor in the UK you get less, worse news — especially online, new research suggests
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Oct. 31, 2016, 10:49 a.m.
    Business Models
    LINK:   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   October 31, 2016

    Some publishers, including Slate and The New Yorker, are ending deals with those content recommendation companies that place sponsored links at the bottom of their pages. (The sector is dominated by and .) “It is not the right look if you’re trying to say you’re a high-quality, upper-tier website — if you have something like this on it — and I think it’s time for us to be honest about that,” Slate president .

    A released last month by the nonprofit ChangeAdvertising.org found that 82 percent of the top 50 news sites “were using ‘content ads’ from vendors including Taboola, Outbrain, Revcontent, and Adblade, amongst others.” We wrote up some of the findings then:

    Clickbait links are often bait-and-switch. This might not be a surprise to anyone who has ever clicked a recommended content link, but recommended content headlines are often very different from those for the stories the link to. Clicking “Horrifying Woodstock Photos That Were Classified” sends you to a story titled “Rare Photos From Woodstock,” to use one example of 20 that ChangeAdvertising.org cites.

    Recommended content widgets still have a disclosure problem. As with publishers, the recommended content companies can’t quite settle on the best way to disclose that their content is paid for. The preferred label, “Promoted Stories,” appeared on 16 percent of the links Change Advertising looked it. At 11 percent, “From the Web” came second, followed by “From Around The Web” (9 percent) and “Recommended for You” (7 percent). The most clear labels (“Paid content,” “Ad content,” etc.) were the least used.

    General reaction on Twitter: Nobody (who actually pays attention to these things) is sad to see these modules go!

    So far, though, Slate and The New Yorker are in the minority of publishers who are ditching these types of ads. The ads are used by The Washington Post, Business Insider, The Huffington Post, MSN, The Daily Beast, The Guardian, Bleacher Report, Vox.com, The Atlantic, and many others. (ChangeAdvertising.org’s report varying numbers of the ads on the sites that use them. Salon.com topped out with 22 Outbrain ads; MSN had 21 Taboola ads.)

    BuzzFeed, Yahoo, The New York Times, Mic, The Boston Globe, The Chicago Tribune, Upworthy, CNET, and Vice are among the publishers who do not use the ads. That list could grow a little longer if the Times story shames people into reconsidering, but that might be unlikely: “We have been told from major, major publishers that we have become their No. 1 revenue provider,” Matt Crenshaw, Outbrain’s VP of product marketing, said.

    Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    If you’re poor in the UK you get less, worse news — especially online, new research suggests
    Poorer people are less likely to go straight to a news site, and the researchers found no online news brand that was read by significantly more poorer people than wealthier people.
    College students broadly mistrust news. Fake Kardashian gossip probably won’t help.
    “Why give them the ammo?”
    Fewer mugshots, less naming and shaming: How editors in Cleveland are trying to build a more compassionate newsroom
    “I didn’t see how we could justify standing on tradition when it was causing that kind of suffering…It really comes down to: How long does somebody have to pay for a mistake?”
    www.majbutne.com.ua/tury-po-stranam/aziya/gruziya/

    majbutne.com.ua

    profvest.com