• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Media change deniers: Why debates around news need a better evidence base — and how we can get one
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Oct. 31, 2016, 10:49 a.m.
    Business Models
    LINK:   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   October 31, 2016

    Some publishers, including Slate and The New Yorker, are ending deals with those content recommendation companies that place sponsored links at the bottom of their pages. (The sector is dominated by and .) “It is not the right look if you’re trying to say you’re a high-quality, upper-tier website — if you have something like this on it — and I think it’s time for us to be honest about that,” Slate president .

    A released last month by the nonprofit ChangeAdvertising.org found that 82 percent of the top 50 news sites “were using ‘content ads’ from vendors including Taboola, Outbrain, Revcontent, and Adblade, amongst others.” We wrote up some of the findings then:

    Clickbait links are often bait-and-switch. This might not be a surprise to anyone who has ever clicked a recommended content link, but recommended content headlines are often very different from those for the stories the link to. Clicking “Horrifying Woodstock Photos That Were Classified” sends you to a story titled “Rare Photos From Woodstock,” to use one example of 20 that ChangeAdvertising.org cites.

    Recommended content widgets still have a disclosure problem. As with publishers, the recommended content companies can’t quite settle on the best way to disclose that their content is paid for. The preferred label, “Promoted Stories,” appeared on 16 percent of the links Change Advertising looked it. At 11 percent, “From the Web” came second, followed by “From Around The Web” (9 percent) and “Recommended for You” (7 percent). The most clear labels (“Paid content,” “Ad content,” etc.) were the least used.

    General reaction on Twitter: Nobody (who actually pays attention to these things) is sad to see these modules go!

    So far, though, Slate and The New Yorker are in the minority of publishers who are ditching these types of ads. The ads are used by The Washington Post, Business Insider, The Huffington Post, MSN, The Daily Beast, The Guardian, Bleacher Report, Vox.com, The Atlantic, and many others. (ChangeAdvertising.org’s report varying numbers of the ads on the sites that use them. Salon.com topped out with 22 Outbrain ads; MSN had 21 Taboola ads.)

    BuzzFeed, Yahoo, The New York Times, Mic, The Boston Globe, The Chicago Tribune, Upworthy, CNET, and Vice are among the publishers who do not use the ads. That list could grow a little longer if the Times story shames people into reconsidering, but that might be unlikely: “We have been told from major, major publishers that we have become their No. 1 revenue provider,” Matt Crenshaw, Outbrain’s VP of product marketing, said.

    Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Media change deniers: Why debates around news need a better evidence base — and how we can get one
    “If we let media change deniers drive the conversation, the result will be dumber journalism, less-informed public debate, and ineffective and counterproductive public policy. Even if what they say sometimes ‘feels right.'”
    Who’s creating the top Facebook videos? “Not people you’ve necessarily heard of”
    Babies and puppies continue to rule the day, and only 2% of the most engaged Facebook videos were posted by traditional publishers.
    Vox’s new Netflix series is really good, but it doesn’t get us any closer to figuring out what news on streaming platforms looks like
    The real revolution in video news will be when someone, someday, figures out a way to make timely, high-quality, democratically useful news work natively on a streaming platform.
    www.majbutne.com.ua/tury-po-stranam/aziya/gruziya/

    majbutne.com.ua

    источник www.profvest.com