• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Bad news from Mashable, BuzzFeed, and Vice shows times are rough for ad-supported digital media
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    July 27, 2016, 11:06 a.m.
    Business Models

    Paywalls and politics: Independent Russian television station TV Rain turns to subscriptions as its future

    Shifting the focus to digital was hardly just a business decision, though: “Really, this was pretty much the only source that could help us go through.”

    For the Moscow-based Russian television station , it was an unlikely form of support — its online paywall and subscription service — that buoyed it through a near death experience.

    The independently owned TV Rain (in Russian: Dozhd, meaning rain) was founded in 2010 by businessman Alexander Vinokurov and his wife Natalia Sindeyeva and hit a wall in February 2014, when after the website ran a poll on the 70th anniversary of the Siege of Leningrad asking whether the Soviets should have surrendered then. (Hundreds of thousands died in the siege.) Public outrage was immense, and TV Rain removed the poll, with an apology.

    At least, that was the reason the providers gave. But given TV Rain’s history of coverage of sensitive political issues and aggressive reporting of prominent figures’ activities, and the created by the Russian government, many between an unhappy Kremlin and attempts to by squeezing providers. TV Rain lost 90 percent of its viewership, and advertisers fled.

    TV Rain actually instituted its paywall in September 2013, intending it to be just an additional a revenue stream. At the time, advertising was its main source of income.

    “When we introduced a paywall almost three years ago, we understood that our business model was more about advertisements, and we also understood that was not so stable,” Lena Kiryushina, digital director for TV Rain, said. “Then we decided we needed to introduce a paywall — but we never thought that would be our future.”

    In 2014, it launched a full-fledged subscription campaign, with renewed urgency.

    “When we were kicked out of all the major networks in Russia, we probably wouldn’t have made it, we probably wouldn’t exist, wouldn’t be sitting in front of you right now,” , editor-in-chief of TV Rain’s website, said. “Really, this was pretty much the only source that could help us go through.”

    TV Rain now has more than 70,000 paying subscribers who pay for access to its flagship programs, news shows, special long reports, and live broadcasts, which TV Rain will sometimes open up to everyone in special cases, such as terrorist attacks. Paywalled videos certainly don’t handle Putin’s reputation with kid gloves: this , for instance, or a piece on “,” journalists who traveled with Putin. It’s reported from . But Klishin emphasized that he doesn’t want the site to be described as “oppositionist,” he said, because “that’s what we’re called by our critics in the government,” and “we want to give both sides a place to talk” (though admittedly, getting government officials to come on TV Rain programs willingly has gotten harder).

    Beyond special coverage, there are other special perks to membership, including a closed Facebook group where subscribers can pose questions and discuss coverage with TV Rain journalists directly. Commenting on all platforms are also open only to subscribers. A year-long subscription costs ₽4,800 rubles (about $73 at the time this story was published), though it’s currently running a summer offer of ₽3,800 rubles for a year. One-month and three-month options are also available.

    tvrain-discount-banner

    For a time after the early 2014 crisis, TV Rain was even forced to continue broadcasting from an apartment after it was evicted from its old studios, its dispatches looking very makeshift. But as a TV station, it’s conveniently positioned to produce digital video, at a time when news outlets are frantically hopping on board the social media video train. It’s repackaging longer programs into five-or-so minute video for social, following the formula of places like AJ+ and NowThis.

    TV Rain has a staff of under 200, and about 10 to 12 people are dedicated to the website (that number is higher if you count developers; the TV programming requires far more production staff). It had to iron out miscommunication between the TV and digital sides; at one point, someone reporting for a broadcast might call a source, and someone writing a text story for the website would do the same, separately.

    “I guess it took us three years to realize we were no longer an ordinary cable TV channel, but a media platform with a live broadcast component, that also is able to have a lot of videos on demand, a lot of articles, which are text,” Klishin said. “Far more people are reading and viewing us online than viewing us through TV screens. Once, when news would happen, we would wait until the evening broadcast. Why were we waiting? At times it felt foolish. Now, as soon as we get any video, any news, it goes first onto our website.”

    Putting up the paywall slowed the site’s growth, Klishin said, though the web audience has tripled in the past three years. Its has also grown to over a million fans and TV Rain has about two million followers on .

    In a reversal from three years ago, subscriptions now make up 60 percent of TV Rain’s revenue, while around 20 percent comes from advertising, according to Kiryushina and Klishin. Distribution through smaller cable systems make up another 20 percent. The site is averaging four to five million unique visitors per month (fluctuating between 18 and 27 million pageviews per month). A substantial number of text stories and shorter video segments are all outside the paywall, covering both breaking news and “the usual Internet stuff”: In addition to hard news, I browsed with the help of Google translate stories on in an upcoming movie, permanent resident , and of course, a TV Rain journalist .

    The political pressure against TV Rain continues. , a pro-Kremlin group made allegations to state prosecutors that TV Rain was violating state media law in its reporting on the Islamic State.

    But whether it was more business imperatives or political pressures that pushed TV Rain to implement the subscription model that essentially saved it from extinction, Kiryushina and Klishin said it was difficult for them to say. Its own journalists struggled a little with the change: “We had, at one point before February 2014, 12 million people watching on TV. Our journalists went from that, to making their content primarily for a web audience, which is four, five, six million? It can be hard to switch that mindset,” Kiryushina said.

    “It’s interesting, I think, that two years ago, our subscribers understood that they were helping to save our channel, to save freedom of speech,” she added. “Now they understand they aren’t saving us, they’re buying premium content. The message is a little different now.”

    POSTED     July 27, 2016, 11:06 a.m.
    SEE MORE ON Business Models
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
    Show comments  
    Show tags
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Bad news from Mashable, BuzzFeed, and Vice shows times are rough for ad-supported digital media
    The rapid growth of Google and Facebook continues to take its toll on digital media companies.
    Asking members to support its journalism (no prizes, no swag), The Guardian raises more reader revenue than ad dollars
    The Guardian revamped its ask and its membership offerings — moving from 12,000 members in the beginning of 2016 to 300,000 today.
    Beating the 404 death knell: Singapore news startups struggle to cover costs and find their footing
    Political news reporting doesn’t seem to be holding up well as a business in the city-state. And it’s even harder when you’re seen as “alternative” media.