• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Media change deniers: Why debates around news need a better evidence base — and how we can get one
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    June 28, 2016, 7:01 p.m.
    Business Models

    Sure, people like online video, but that doesn’t mean they want to watch your hard news videos

    “Even for brands associated with hard news…their top or second videos in terms of Facebook engagement numbers turned out to be animal videos.”

    On November 13, 2015, terrorists coordinated multiple attacks in Paris, killing 130 people and injuring hundreds. On the day of the attacks, the BBC experienced the highest online traffic day in its history; the following day, November 14, 19 percent of the visitors to the BBC’s site watched video, compared to 11 percent on a typical day.

    A released Tuesday by Oxford’s finds that “interest in video news does increase significantly when there is a big breaking news story.”

    But the rest of the time? Online video news is less of a force than publishers might hope. The Reuters Institute’s , which came out earlier this month, noted that only about a quarter of 50,000 respondents across 26 countries watch online news video in a given week.

    “Website users in particular remain resistant to online video news,” write the authors of the new Reuters report released Tuesday. Analyzing Chartbeat data from 30 news outlets across the U.S., U.K., Germany, and Italy (17 of the outlets were American, nine were broadcasters), the researchers found that the sites’ users spent “only around 2.5 percent of average visit time” on pages that included videos, and “97.5 percent of time is still spent with text.” That 2.5 percent of time spent was even lower than the total share of pages that have videos (6.5 percent).

    We keep hearing about the boom in online video, so what’s going on? To be clear, the report’s authors distinguish between “news video” hosted on publishers’ own sites and video on social networks or centered around “softer news and lifestyle content (or premium drama and sports on demand)” rather than hard news. They researchers urge caution in conflating the fast growth of online video in general with the growth of, specifically, hard news video.

    “So far, the growth around online video news seems to be largely driven by technology, platforms, and publishers rather than by strong consumer demand,” , one of the report’s authors, said in a statement.

    Reuters online news consumption 2016

    Facebook adds a further wrinkle. On Facebook, almost 40 percent of the most successful videos from the 30 brands that Reuters looked at “related to lifestyle or entertainment content (for instance about animals, babies, or cooking) rather than harder news subjects such as current affairs, politics, science, or the environment.” And “even for brands associated with hard news like The Telegraph, The Guardian, or The Independent, their top or second videos in terms of Facebook engagement numbers turned out to be animal videos.”

    Monetization of online news video remains a big challenge. On their own sites, publishers still tend to monetize videos with preroll advertising. That’s a problem: Of the users in Reuters’ previously released survey who hadn’t watched online news video in the past week, 35 percent said preroll ads put them off.

    “We think that preroll is one of the crummiest innovations of digital video,” , Quartz’s executive editor, told Reuters. “Can you imagine a broadcaster forcing you to watch an ad every two and a half minutes?…I am astonished to even find myself having that conversation sometimes.”

    But Quartz’s attitude isn’t shared by many other publishers, at least not to the extent that they’re changing their business models. , Trinity Mirror’s digital innovation editor, said, “What we know, right now, is that advertisers are happy with prerolls. It’s what they want. The consumer is fairly familiar with them.” And , head of digital at ITV News, wishes that the advertising business would create more “five-second prerolls” instead of the more common 30-second ads. (Facebook, meanwhile, doesn’t allow preroll ads in the News Feed.)

    “Video is clearly going to be a much bigger part of the future news landscape, but it is unlikely to replace text,” the report’s authors conclude. “We should also not expect a new format like video to solve the fundamental problems of the news industry any time soon.”

    The full report is .

    POSTED     June 28, 2016, 7:01 p.m.
    SEE MORE ON Business Models
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Media change deniers: Why debates around news need a better evidence base — and how we can get one
    “If we let media change deniers drive the conversation, the result will be dumber journalism, less-informed public debate, and ineffective and counterproductive public policy. Even if what they say sometimes ‘feels right.'”
    Who’s creating the top Facebook videos? “Not people you’ve necessarily heard of”
    Babies and puppies continue to rule the day, and only 2% of the most engaged Facebook videos were posted by traditional publishers.
    Vox’s new Netflix series is really good, but it doesn’t get us any closer to figuring out what news on streaming platforms looks like
    The real revolution in video news will be when someone, someday, figures out a way to make timely, high-quality, democratically useful news work natively on a streaming platform.
    ссылка sweet-smoke.com.ua

    www.nl.ua

    посмотреть kls-agency.com.ua