• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Jan. 29, 2016, 9:56 a.m.
    Reporting & Production

    A new storytelling platform hopes to move crisis reporting beyond isolated events in the news cycle

    The idea of Coda Story “is to watch things unfurl at the pace of evolving trends rather than daily developments.”

    The homepage is a busy place — filled to the corners, literally, with stories exploring different facets of Russia’s war on LGBTQ rights. There’s a video profile of a transgender woman living in Georgia. There’s a collection of intimate portraits of the LGBTQ community in Armenia’s capital city. There’s an overview of the Kremlin’s public stance on gay rights.

    Coda Story is a “single-issue web platform,” as its team describes it, and it was built to capture all the geopolitical and economic undercurrents that contribute to the bubbling-over of a conflict: to “stay on the story” after the news cycle has largely moved on. At the moment, the nonprofit is in the first month of a three-month pilot to cover LGBTQ rights in Russia as thoroughly and continuously as possible. Readers can view pieces such as the within the context of overarching themes. These main themes are displayed as a framework designed to help readers visualize trend lines as stories are published to the site.

    Coda-Story-currents-screenshot

    “We wanted to test the process of running a full Coda deployment — of being live online, updating the stories, commissioning stories, and so on,” said , Coda Story co-founder and a long-time correspondent for the BBC. “A big reason we picked the topic of gay rights in Russia is that we felt it would play into the strength of Coda’s editorial approach, where you take a very narrow focus but use that as a window into much bigger issues.”

    This editorial approach has been incubating for quite some time: In collaboration with user-experience design firm Method (which offered its services free), the Coda team developed the “Currents” tool as well as a specific visual identity to win in the summer of 2014. The online platform itself, called , was created by web developer , a former Washington Post staff writer.

    Coda launched a in December to match a foundation grant it had received, and ended up raising an additional $23,000 from 191 backers. Most of the funders were from the U.S., some were from continental Europe, and a smaller number from Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, and other countries from the former Soviet Union.

    In the case of LGBTQ rights in Russia, Antelava hopes the stories will attract two different sets of readers.

    “This pilot is definitely something that will be of interest to the LGBTQ community around the world,” she said. “But we want to make it just as interesting for anyone who wants to understand this part of the world, or wants to understand Putin, or wants to understand what’s happening in Eastern Ukraine. It’s a niche audience, but in this case, we’ve covered potentially two niches.”

    This echoes the line of thinking espoused by , founder and executive editor of the single-subject “Deeply” sites (Syria Deeply, Ebola Deeply, Water Deeply, Arctic Deeply).

    “We should be covering species-level issues,” Setrakian told me recently. “If it’s a species-level issue, and we’re not seeing it adequately covered in the news cycle, that makes it a candidate … The most important thing is choosing one and focusing on execution until we find that it’s reached an adequate level of development.”

    Coda’s mission is to “stay on the story” after mainstream media leaves a crisis region, but how will it convince readers to come back to the issues it’s so painstakingly covering?

    “We’re not in the business of flogging dead horses. We pick crises that are consequential and complex, and that can’t be understood through sporadic flashes of attention,” , Coda Story’s chief content officer, said. “It’s less about persuading the readers to keep following a particular topic for a length of time, and more about making sure we keep bringing them stuff that is as interesting as the crisis is. The more invested you are in something, the more interesting it is.”

    The site features pieces written by the , as well as contributions from freelancers and other journalists. It has an editorial partnership and content exchange with news and analysis site and can tap into that site’s large network of writers on the ground.

    Still, with a limited staff, the site won’t be trying to keep up with breaking news.

    “The idea is to watch things unfurl at the pace of evolving trends rather than daily developments,” Fielding-Smith said. “But, of course, timeliness is key to impact. Our social media people are monitoring news developments and using them as pegs to push our content with. And we’ll be hopefully anticipating developments, doing reporting that complements the news cycle.”

    Antelava stresses this is still just a pilot. “We are constantly talking to people about story ideas or what can be done differently, where we can contribute a perspective or a new angle or maybe have a bit of a scoop.”

    In the short term, the team will continue to rely on the initial burst of foundation and crowdfunding money; the editorial commitment is three months. In the long run, though, Coda Story will explore other revenue streams, including licensing its editorial methods to other groups looking to cover a specific issue.

    POSTED     Jan. 29, 2016, 9:56 a.m.
    SEE MORE ON Reporting & Production
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
    Plus: How YouTubers spread far-right beliefs (don’t just blame algorithms), and another cry for less both-sides journalism.
    Public or closed? How much activity really exists? See how other news organizations’ Facebook Groups are faring
    We analyzed the data of groups as large as 40,000 members and as small as 300, from international organizations to local publishers. How does yours fit in?
    Here’s what the Financial Times is doing to get bossy man voice out of (okay, less prominent in) its opinion section
    “She wrote a fabulous piece that did incredibly well and I think there’s no way on earth that (a) she would have submitted or (b) it would have run, before we started this stuff. It got more than double the usual number of pageviews for an opinion piece.”
    mitsubishi.niko.ua

    kls-agency.com.ua

    xn--80adrlof.net/dlya-poliva/