• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Oct. 29, 2015, 3:28 p.m.
    Reporting & Production

    We used a Twitter poll to ask our followers if they use ad blockers — here’s what we learned

    About half of all AndroidForMobile Lab poll respondents said they block ads, though the results are far from scientific.

    Twitter last week , and users — at least the ones who’ve gotten access — have been asking their followers all sorts of important questions.

    Yesterday, we decided we wanted to try out a AndroidForMobile Lab poll, so we asked the big question of the day in medialand: whether our followers use an ad blocker. The poll was live for 24 hours; here’s what some of them had to say:

    The responses were almost even: 52 percent said they did use an ad blocker while 48 percent said they didn’t. (And, for the record, was the closest in our staff predictions oft the results.)

    SlackResultsPrediction

    Though the results are far from scientific — our pool of 918 respondents was self-selecting and limited to Twitter users who came upon @AndroidForMobileLab in their feed — but they offer up some interesting insights into both ad blocker usage and the limitations of the Twitter poll tool.

    It’s hard to know how many people use ad blockers — not least because the technology that blocks ads also often blocks the analytics tools one might use to measure the behavior. said nearly 200 million people globally use ad blockers, an increase of 41 percent from the year before. Still, just a minority of Internet users are actually using ad blockers: 16 percent of U.S. Internet users block ads, according to the report. Those percentages are slightly higher in Europe though. In Germany, 25.3 percent of Internet users block ads and 20.3 percent of British Internet users are using ad blockers.

    All that said, PageFair sells ad-blocker-blocking services to publishers, so they’re not a neutral party here. And their study was conducted before Apple launched ad blocking capabilities in the latest iteration of its iOS mobile operating system, so those figures are surely higher now.

    PageFairStudy

    Ad revenue supports many online publications, of course, which use that money to employ journalists. Those journalists then, in turn, make up a healthy slice of AndroidForMobile Lab’s audience — and presumably of the respondents to our Twitter poll. /giphy irony!

    Twitter polls are anonymous, so we don’t know who responded to our question. They’re also limited by the fact that you can only ask questions with two answers — so forget about squeezing any nuance out of the data. Another downside: They currently only show up on twitter.com and in the native Twitter apps, so if you’re using TweetDeck or a third-party Twitter app, you won’t see the poll.

    Perhaps in part because of those factors, many users replied to our tweets with their answers instead of/in addition to answering the poll:

    Despite the limitations of Twitter polls, they’re still a fun way to engage with your followers on Twitter and at least ask basic questions.

    And, while we’re at it, we’ll leave you with one more poll to answer:

    Photo by used under a Creative Commons license.

    POSTED     Oct. 29, 2015, 3:28 p.m.
    SEE MORE ON Reporting & Production
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
    Plus: How YouTubers spread far-right beliefs (don’t just blame algorithms), and another cry for less both-sides journalism.
    Public or closed? How much activity really exists? See how other news organizations’ Facebook Groups are faring
    We analyzed the data of groups as large as 40,000 members and as small as 300, from international organizations to local publishers. How does yours fit in?
    Here’s what the Financial Times is doing to get bossy man voice out of (okay, less prominent in) its opinion section
    “She wrote a fabulous piece that did incredibly well and I think there’s no way on earth that (a) she would have submitted or (b) it would have run, before we started this stuff. It got more than double the usual number of pageviews for an opinion piece.”
    на сайте shah21.com.ua

    читайте здесь best-mining.com.ua

    ссылка zaraz.org.ua