• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    With in-article chat bots, BBC is experimenting with new ways to introduce readers to complex topics
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    July 11, 2014, 9:30 a.m.

    This Week in Review: Facebook and online control, and educating stronger data journalists

    Plus: Google and censorship, The Wall Street Journal turns 125, and the rest of this week’s news about journalism and tech.

    This week’s essential reads: The key pieces this week are NYU’s Jay Rosen (in an and an ) on Facebook’s legitimacy and control, journalism professor Alberto Cairo on solving data journalism’s current crisis, and Cornell’s Tarleton Gillespie on algorithms, journalism, news judgment, and personalization.

    Facebook, online research, and control: A week after on News Feed content and user emotions initially prompted an uproar, observers continued to talk about its implications for research, social media, and control. A privacy group with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission late last week, and the journal that published the study “expression of concern.”

    Others pushed back against the outrage at Facebook over the study: Microsoft researcher Duncan Watts that our emotions are being manipulated all the time by marketers and politicians and said we should insist that companies like Facebook “perform and publish research on the effects of the decisions they’re already making on our behalf.” Likewise, Forbes’ Jeff Bercovici said Facebook’s study was than it’s being made out to be.

    Former Facebook data scientist Andrew Ledvina why there was so much outrage about this particular study when Facebook conducts constant experiments on user behavior. The only change Ledvina saw emerging from this episode was not that Facebook would stop doing these types of experiments, but that it would stop making them public. Similarly, Microsoft’s Andrés Monroy-Hernández said the incendiary tone of the discussion surrounding this study to share his own research publicly.

    Blogger and developer Dave Winer this incident by destroying its users’ illusion of an organically generated News Feed: “Facebook just broke the fourth wall. Of a sudden we see the man behind the curtain. And it’s ugly and arrogant and condescending and all around not a nice feeling.” On the other hand, Gigaom’s Tom Krazit said most users , but we don’t know how they’re doing it, so we can no longer consider it a useful source of news.

    NYU’s Jay Rosen that Facebook has a very “thin” form of legitimacy for its experiments because of its lack of attunement to ethical concerns, and in an , he warned that Facebook needs to be careful not to derive false confidence from its dominance of the social media market. “‘Where else are they going to go?” is a long way from trust and loyalty. It is less a durable business model than a statement of power,” he wrote.

    From a bigger-picture viewpoint, Stanford professor Michael Bernstein said how they apply the principle of informed consent to online environment, and Gigaom founder Om Malik that needs to come with the unprecedented level of data and automation that’s involved in modern life.

    noisy-data-cc

    Improving data journalism with education: A couple of conversations this week converged on two important issues facing the news industry: data journalism and journalism education. Miami journalism professor Alberto Cairo diagnosed the underwhelming output at some of the prominent new data-oriented journalism sites, concluding that “Even if data journalism is by no means a new phenomenon, it has entered the mainstream quite recently, breezed over the peak of inflated expectations, and precipitously sank into a valley of gloom.” Cairo made a set of prescriptions for data journalism, including devoting more time, resources, and careful critical thinking to it. At Gigaom, Derrick Harris , especially in finding and developing new datasets. And sociology professor Zeynep Tufekci to look at flaws in statistical prediction models.

    In a weeklong series, PBS MediaShift took a deeper look at what journalism schools are doing to meet the growing demand for skilled, critically thinking data journalists. The series included an with Alex Howard of Columbia’s Tow Center, tips from The Upshot’s Derek Willis on to understand it and find its stories, a look at , and of ways to incorporate data into journalism education.

    Elsewhere in journalism education, the American Journalism Review’s Michael King at American journalism schools, noting the tricky question of whether these declines are a leading or lagging indicator — something primarily indicative, in other words, of journalism’s last several years or next several years. And David Ryfe, director of the University of Iowa’s journalism school, of fitting the dozens of skills desired by employers into a relatively small number of journalism courses.

    google-censorship

    Google raises censorship concerns: One story on Google and censorship that came to a head late last week: In response to a May ruling by a European court, Google began removing pages from certain European search results per requests filed based on irrelevant or false information. By last week, that began including news articles, on Merrill Lynch, but also . In a pair of helpful posts, The Guardian’s Charles Arthur , and Marketing Land’s Danny Sullivan  the removals of news articles.

    Google to remove several links to Guardian stories as British news organizations of the law. Gigaom’s and The Next Web’s both posited that Google, which opposed the ruling, is enforcing it in deliberately draconian so as to create a controversy about the censorship it entails. But Danny Sullivan that it’s highly unlikely that Google is doing this to sabotage the ruling, since the links it’s removing span much broader than easily outraged media outlets.

    Reading roundup: A few other bits and pieces going on during this slow week:

    — The Wall Street Journal this week with an looking at how they’ve covered big news events in the past as well as a . The Lab’s Joseph Lichterman took a closer look at the Journal’s anniversary offerings, and Capital New York . The Atlantic’s Adrienne LaFrance, meanwhile, had a through the years.

    — The Pew Research Center on the declining number of reporters covering U.S. state legislatures and what’s being done to fill the gaps. The Lab’s Joseph Lichterman wrote a good summary.

    — This week’s handiest piece: Sarah Marshall’s of the tips Johanna Geary, head of news at Twitter UK, gave to British journalists about using Tweetdeck as a reporting tool.

    — The U.S. National Security Agency documents leaked by Edward Snowden revealed another finding on surveillance this week: The Washington Post that the number of ordinary American Internet users in communications intercepted by the NSA far outnumber the legally targeted foreigners. The Intercept also on several prominent Muslim American academics and activists who were monitored by the NSA. The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald about why the story is important, while PandoDaily’s Paul Carr in publishing the story.

    — Finally, the Lab’s Caroline O’Donovan talked to Cornell’s Tarleton Gillespie about a wide range of issues surrounding algorithms, including personalized news, news judgment, and clickbait.

    Photos of Queen Elizabeth II, manipulated into happiness and sadness, by and of painting by both used under a Creative Commons license.

    POSTED     July 11, 2014, 9:30 a.m.
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    With in-article chat bots, BBC is experimenting with new ways to introduce readers to complex topics
    “For us, this is a way to let people read and ask questions at their own pace, instead of having them read through long screens of text. Often people aren’t engaged in stories because they haven’t had the right context.”
    Can we keep media literacy from becoming a partisan concept like fact checking?
    Plus: Screen time debates, and what the data says about kids and smartphones.
    After years of testing, The Wall Street Journal has built a paywall that bends to the individual reader
    Non-subscribers visiting WSJ.com now get a score, based on dozens of signals, that indicates how likely they’ll be to subscribe. The paywall tightens or loosens accordingly: “The content you see is the output of the paywall, rather than an input.”
    битумная черепица купить

    granit-sunrise.com.ua