• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    Bad news from Mashable, BuzzFeed, and Vice shows times are rough for ad-supported digital media
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    June 26, 2014, 4:51 p.m.
    Aggregation & Discovery
    LINK:   |   Posted by: Liam Andrew   |   June 26, 2014

    is one of data visualization’s leading lights. As creator of the hugely popular visualization library and editor in The New York Times’ graphics department, he has had a hand (visibly and invisibly) in most of the widely shared interactives on the web.

    Today Bostock posted an adaptation of a celebrated talk he gave at about visualizing algorithms. Full of ideas and gorgeous patterns, it’s an elegant flip to the script of the typical data visualization.

    Computers are sometimes between , and we usually visualize the data, while ignoring the processes that manipulate it. But Bostock argues that “visualization is more than a tool for finding patterns in data.”

    He breaks down various methods for sampling, shuffling, sorting, and making mazes, ably explaining (via text and gorgeous graphics) why there are different types of randomness, for example, or how to most effectively sort a list.

    bostock-quicksort

    Bostock is interested in the value of visualizing algorithms for learning about and understanding complex processes. A novice could use a visualization to peer into an algorithm’s black box; an expert algorithm builder might visualize in order to debug and reframe it.

    He classifies algorithm visualizations based on the level of introspection they give into the data — some only show the output, while others let you peer fully into how data points are being manipulated.

    The goal here is to study the behavior of an algorithm rather than a specific dataset. Yet there is still data, necessarily — the data is derived from the execution of the algorithm. And this means we can use the type of derived data to classify algorithm visualizations.

    Using his work on the Times’  as an example, he shows how opening up the algorithm allows for new questions:

    To output an accurate answer, the calculator needs accurate inputs. While some inputs are well-known (such as the length of your mortgage), others are difficult or impossible to predict. No one can say exactly how the stock market will perform, how much a specific home will appreciate or depreciate, or how the renting market will change over time.

    We can make educated guesses at each variable — for example, looking at . But if the calculator is a black box, then readers can’t see how sensitive their answer is to small changes.

    To fix this, we need to do more than output a single number. We need to show how the underlying system works.

    rent-vs-buy

    Some of the examples are fairly technical and outwardly trivial — in a sense, what are the social implications of a sorting algorithm as long as the sorting happens? But they do demonstrate the sheer number of ways to solve a seemingly simple problem, and in the case of some of these examples (such as sampling algorithms), the results matter immensely.

    The examples also demonstrate an opportunity to rethink what a visualization can tell us. Whether static or dynamic, or whether describing a state or a process, a visualization can show and hide as much as it needs.

    Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Bad news from Mashable, BuzzFeed, and Vice shows times are rough for ad-supported digital media
    The rapid growth of Google and Facebook continues to take its toll on digital media companies.
    Asking members to support its journalism (no prizes, no swag), The Guardian raises more reader revenue than ad dollars
    The Guardian revamped its ask and its membership offerings — moving from 12,000 members in the beginning of 2016 to 300,000 today.
    Beating the 404 death knell: Singapore news startups struggle to cover costs and find their footing
    Political news reporting doesn’t seem to be holding up well as a business in the city-state. And it’s even harder when you’re seen as “alternative” media.