• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    How to buy into journalism’s blockchain future (in only 44 steps)
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    May 30, 2014, 10 a.m.

    This Week in Review: Kinsley vs. Greenwald on NSA secrets, and new data on mobile’s rise

    Plus: Conversation continues on changes at The New York Times, and the rest of the week’s journalism and tech news and commentary.

    This week’s essential reads: The key articles this week were Michael Kinsley’s of Glenn Greenwald’s new book, the Lab’s Joshua Benton on the gap between mobile and print attention and advertising, and of Columbia Journalism Review on historical trends in newspapers’ reliance on reader vs. advertising revenue.

    A new attack on Greenwald’s judgment: Late last week, political journalist and pundit Michael Kinsley launched a particularly contentious new round in the nearly year-old debate about the release of Edward Snowden’s documents about National Security Agency surveillance. Kinsley of Glenn Greenwald’s book No Place to Hide for The New York Times which described the book as self-righteously bombastic and concluded that the government should ultimately have the responsibility for determining what of its information gets released. “Someone gets to decide” what gets published, he wrote, “and that someone cannot be Glenn Greenwald.”

    Kinsley’s review unleashed a storm of livid responses, with the Freedom of the Press Foundation’s , Gawker’s , and Firedoglake’s , all arguing that, as Nolan put it, “Michael Kinsley is coming out in opposition to journalism.” The Washington Post’s  also argued that even though Kinsley says Greenwald can’t be trusted to decide what gets published, he doesn’t give any evidence that Greenwald’s mismanaged it. Greenwald also , saying that Kinsley’s review was simply evidence of the complicity of Washington journalism with government authority.

    Times public editor Margaret Sullivan both Kinsley and the Times’ Book Review editor, Pamela Paul, for the review, concluding that while the piece shouldn’t have been edited to change its point of view, “surely editing ought to point out gaping holes in an argument, remove ad hominem language and question unfair characterizations; that didn’t happen here.”

    Kinsley  by saying she mischaracterized his argument as well as American legal protections for the press, and New York magazine’s Jonathan Chait regarding Sullivan’s response: “The notion that it’s wrong for the book review to print abhorrent reviews, let alone to poke fun at no less a hero than Glenn Greenwald, is an artifact of the culture of smugness that Kinsley is writing about here,” he wrote.

    Kinsley’s wasn’t the only critical review of Greenwald’s book. At Prospect magazine, The New Yorker’s George Packer wrote a of Greenwald’s account and argument. On the other side, GQ with Greenwald about the book, the Snowden documents, and his background.

    Snowden himself also made some public statements this week, in the form of a . In it, he denied any relationship with or support from the Russian government and lamented that he was “stuck” in a place with so little protection for the individual rights he champions. The New York Times of the interview’s particularly noteworthy elements, as well as the .

    mary-meeker-adshare-2013

    New numbers on the state of the Internet: Legendary Internet analyst and venture capitalist Mary Meeker on the state of the Internet this week, which, as the Lab’s Joshua Benton noted, is a very useful set of hard numbers to pin down our sense of how the Internet is changing and where it’s headed. The trend that got the most attention was the acceleration of mobile use: As of Forbes and Recode’s  highlighted, the growth of Internet use is slowing, while smartphone use is up more than 20 percent annually around the world and mobile traffic is up 81 percent, thanks largely to video.

    Forbes’ Jeff Bercovici also in sensors and other wearable or mobile systems that are measuring mountains of user data, only a very small portion of which is being analyzed. On the financial side, Meeker suggesting that tech’s role in the market isn’t approaching the bubbly levels of the dotcom bust era, as Recode’s James Temple noted, though Fortune’s Dan Primack that Meeker was selectively omitting data indicating abnormally high VC valuations of tech companies.

    For those in traditional journalism, Benton broke down what he called the scariest chart in Meeker’s slide deck, which shows that despite the decline in print advertising, it still far outstrips the attention paid to print, which continues to drop annually. Benton noted that while one could argue that print may be a medium distinctly suited for advertising, newspapers need to reckon with the fact that “Print advertising is not coming back. It will fall further. Substantially further.” On the flip side, he said, “mobile is eating the world, and most news organizations make only a pittance off it.”

    Reading roundup: A few more things to check out as this relatively slow week comes to a close:

    — On the New York Times and diversity front: The Pew Research Center’s Monica Anderson that new Times executive editor Dean Baquet is part of a small minority of racial and ethnic minorities in American newspapers. The New Yorker’s Ken Auletta gave on the circumstances behind the firing of his predecessor, Jill Abramson, and at The Washington Post, journalism professor Nikki Usher that beyond Abramson, women are being marginalized in journalism, especially the more tech-centric parts of it. Former Digital First journalist Mandy Jenkins that tech is an asset, not an obstacle, for women to gain larger roles in newsrooms.

    — On the New York Times and innovation front: In Politico magazine, David Warsh the Times’ as short-sighted, while French media executive Frédéric Filloux and said it could conceivably even drop print and survive financially. Here at the Lab, Times news analytics director James Robinson explained a tool the Times is using to track the flow of traffic and audience attention across the site, and Benton noted that the paper was restructuring its Page 1 meetings to be more digital in focus, as the innovation report had recommended.

    — The New York Times’ David Carr , the publisher-as-platform run by Evan Williams of Blogger and Twitter fame. Ricardo Bilton of Digiday for bringing in revenue as well.

    — Finally, Columbia Journalism Review’s Ryan Chittum to make the case that newspapers have been relying on inflated advertising revenue and must extract more revenue from their readers as they did before about 1980.

    Photos of Glenn Greenwald by and of Michael Kinsley by used under a Creative Commons license.

    POSTED     May 30, 2014, 10 a.m.
    SHARE THIS STORY
       
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    How to buy into journalism’s blockchain future (in only 44 steps)
    Blockchain-and-journalism startup Civil aims to build a decentralized infrastructure for news, and you can invest in their vision. It just might take you a while.
    How the Broke in Philly collaboration is focusing local media’s attention on poverty and economic mobility
    “As journalists, we’re taught to be competitive and territorial. On the other hand, things are changing dramatically, so don’t assume other people in your local market don’t want to collaborate.”
    How France beat back information manipulation (and how other democracies might do the same)
    “French success resulted from a combination of structural factors, luck, as well as the effective anticipation and reaction of the Macron campaign staff, the government, and civil society, especially the mainstream media.”
    https://velotime.com.ua

    http://baden-medservice.com

    baden-medservice.com