• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    A year to embrace journalism as public service
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Aug. 30, 2013, 11 a.m.

    This Week in Review: Journalism and the surveillance state, and ESPN’s conflict of interest

    Plus: The New York Times’ site is hacked, Al Jazeera America’s initial reviews, and the rest of the week’s journalism and tech news.

    Work on the Snowden documents spreads: A couple of smaller new stories trickled out this week regarding U.S. NSA surveillance, led by on the U.S.’ secret intelligence budget and the revelation that the to cover their costs in complying with its PRISM online data-gathering program. One of those companies has been anonymously fighting a government gag order about a surveillance case, though a inadvertently identified it as Google. A on the Australian news site The Stringer accused Google of being essentially an arm of the U.S. State Department.

    Elsewhere, the British newspaper The Independent about a secret U.K. surveillance base in the Middle East, claiming that it was in Edward Snowden’s leaked documents. Snowden and The Guardian’s Glenn Greenwald that Snowden was The Independent’s source, with Greenwald suggesting that the leak actually came from the UK government itself (something The Independent denied).

    The Guardian also that it’s brought in The New York Times to work with it on the Snowden documents after the U.K. government made the paper destroy its hard copies in that country. BuzzFeed’s Ben Smith that The Times is working on a set of stories to co-publish with The Guardian next month. ProPublica also that it’s working on the documents, first with The Guardian and most recently with The Times. The Guardian’s editors about their work with the documents, and The Times’ public editor, Margaret Sullivan, on its reporting on the story.

    Critics continued to target the U.S. and U.K. governments for their actions toward the journalists reporting on the leaks, led by the . Free Press’ Josh Stearns to fight back, and the British journalism review Press Gazette . Likewise, The Times’ David Carr for turning against Greenwald as a fellow journalist, a point . NYU’s Jay Rosen that the surveillance state is trying to “throw sand in the gears” of journalism, and that “journalism almost has to be brought closer to activism to stand a chance of prevailing in its current struggle with the state.”


    Journalistic integrity questions at ESPN: A troubling development late last week in the world of sports journalism prompted some further questions about the relationship between journalists and their sources — not involving the state, but with the sports leagues they cover. PBS’ Frontline that ESPN was taking its name off of a documentary on the NFL’s response to head injuries that the two groups had been collaborating on. The initial suspicion was that ESPN backed out to avoid incurring the wrath of its most lucrative broadcast partner (it has a $15.2 billion deal to broadcast the NFL’s games), and that appeared to be confirmed by a that the NFL pressured ESPN after seeing the doc’s trailer.

    ESPN that its decision was influenced by the NFL, and said it pulled out because it didn’t have any editorial control over the program. The New Republic’s Marc Tracy (before the Times piece was published), that the network was probably more over-careful than anything. ESPN ombudsman Robert Lipsyte exactly what happened, but said it was clumsiness at best and a more sinister elevation of profit motive over journalism at worst.

    Sports Illustrated’s Richard Deitsch that will continue to test the tenuous relationship between the NFL, ESPN’s business side, and its journalism operations. The Nation’s Dave Zirin , anonymously quoting several veteran ESPN journalists who lamented the extreme power imbalance in favor of business interests over journalism at the network. “It is not a journalism company. It’s an entertainment company,” said one. “When you get in bed with the devil, sooner or later you start growing your own horns.”

    ESPN received a torrent of criticism externally as well. The NFL players’ union as a “disappointing day for journalism,” and Sports Business Journal’s John Ourand it was a “huge black eye for ESPN.” Awful Announcing’s , grad student , and freelance sports journalist  all talked about what an ominous indicator this was of ESPN’s journalistic integrity. Poynter’s Kelly McBride said the episode that “it’s incredibly difficult for a news organization to hold its own partners accountable.”

    Deadspin’s Barry Petchesky past examples of ESPN bowing to leagues’ pressure, and The New York Times published an in-depth – on ESPN’s dominance of the world of college athletics that even led to a mid-2000s Justice Department investigation. The Columbia Journalism Review’s Dean Starkman why ESPN’s conflicts between business and journalism are even more fundamental than in the rest of the journalism world.


    Another news org’s site hacked: The New York Times’ website went down for several hours on Tuesday because of a hack by the Syrian Electronic Army, a group sympathetic to the Bashar al-Assad regime there. It was the second time The Times’ site had gone down in the past month, and at least the third time a news organization’s site had been brought down by the Syrian Electronic Army in the past few months. and have good summaries of the attack.

    Poynter’s Andrew Beaujon has a of pieces explaining the attack, which hijacked The Times’ entries in the Domain Name System and changed the records that allow web browsers to determine what server www.nytimes.com refers too. (It didn’t involve any access to The Times’ servers.) The Washington Post’s and CloudFlare’s had the best explanations of what happened, and the Los Angeles Times that the attack started with a phishing email at the paper’s domain registrar.

    Reading roundup: A few other stories floating around this week:

    — The initial ratings for Al Jazeera America’s launch last week were (given its newness and its difficulty getting carriage on cable providers). Public radio program Here & Now talked about to AJAM, and at the Columbia Journalism Review, j-school dean Lawrence Pintak gave a of the new network, calling it solid if unspectacular. Quartz’s Todd Woody looked at AJAM’s , and Doc Searls the loss of Al Jazeera’s live online stream in the U.S. and cable companies’ aversion to the web.

    — Directors of the drone journalism programs at two j-schools, the universities of Missouri and Nebraska, reported that they’ve been . As The Chronicle of Higher Education , the two programs will apply for federal permission to test the drones outdoors, but the decision throws the development of this new journalistic subfield into question. Nebraska’s Matt Waite also at his program’s blog.

    — Medium, the invite-only publishing platform co-founded by a couple of the founders of Twitter, drew some discussion about its growth and identity over the past week. Bloomberg Businessweek co-founder Evan Williams, and The Atlantic’s Alexis Madrigal what exactly Medium is, as did GigaOM’s . Medium user Anil Dash .

    — that the tech site All Things D is looking around for a potential buyer as its contract with News Corp subsidiary Dow Jones expires at the end of the year. GigaOM’s Mathew Ingram looked at , and Reuters’ Felix Salmon Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg have built up at All Things D.

    — Finally, The Guardian’s Stijn Debrouwere he gave regarding news organizations’ misuse of data analytics and how they can make them more effective. It’s worth a read this weekend.

    Photo of football concussion study in progress by used under a Creative Commons license.

    POSTED     Aug. 30, 2013, 11 a.m.
    Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    A year to embrace journalism as public service
    “In 2019 we will continue to bring together newsrooms, facilitators, and funders to forge a framework for revitalizing local news with public service at the center.”
    The year of loyalty
    “Gone are the days of aggregation by small and medium-sized brands. Gone are the days of chasing traffic. Gone are the days of one-size-fits all splashy marketing campaigns.”
    Power to the user
    “The results of the 2018 midterms showed people that their votes count and that they can insulate themselves from disinformation campaigns by going to trusted sites instead of Facebook feeds.”


    Узнайте про интересный веб портал , он описывает в статьях про привод для ворот.