• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    HOME
              
    LATEST STORY
    If you’re poor in the UK you get less, worse news — especially online, new research suggests
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    July 31, 2013, 1:45 p.m.
    LINK: www.reddit.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Caroline O'Donovan   |   July 31, 2013

    Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, answered questions in an on today. Most of the conversation focused on the NSA PRISM leak, but he also goes into detail about his understanding of the paper’s business model and strategy.

    Asks redditor :

    The news business is notorious for not making money. Do these big, global scoops have any noticeable effect on circulation or any positive business impact?

    Or are they part of the civic duty element of news reporting, to be investigated no matter how much they cost in man hours, legal fees,and so on?

    Or, put another way: what do the accountants make of these big investigations? Thanks!

    To which Rusbridger responded:

    Complicated answer: huge readership on mobile and website. Hasn’t made much impact on print sales. So, no direct revenues. It has also been very expensive: it’s involved a considerable number of reporters, several lawyers, a great deal of cost in travel/hotels etc etc.

    Happily, the Guardian has been owned by a family Trust since the 1930s. That means that the main imperative for what we do is journalistic. The business side of the operation completely support this kind of editorial endeavour because they understand that’s the mission.

    Having said that, we do have to make money. And this kind of reporting does – hopefully – reinforce a perception of the Guardian as a paper that still does proper journalism. And that, in the end, builds a readership and a reputation. And that’s being reflected in our digital revenues (grew last year 28.9% to £55.9m). So, in the end, good journalism = good business. That’s the theory, anyway!

    Also of note, Rusbridger was asked a variant of the Reddit query: Would you rather fight 100 duck-sized horses or one horse-sized duck?

    rusbridger-ducks

    Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
     
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    If you’re poor in the UK you get less, worse news — especially online, new research suggests
    Poorer people are less likely to go straight to a news site, and the researchers found no online news brand that was read by significantly more poorer people than wealthier people.
    College students broadly mistrust news. Fake Kardashian gossip probably won’t help.
    “Why give them the ammo?”
    Fewer mugshots, less naming and shaming: How editors in Cleveland are trying to build a more compassionate newsroom
    “I didn’t see how we could justify standing on tradition when it was causing that kind of suffering…It really comes down to: How long does somebody have to pay for a mistake?”
    photolifeway.com

    www.seotexts.com

    Levitra Generico