• Lab
  • AndroidForMobile Foundation at
    Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    Nov. 4, 2008, 10:41 a.m.

    News sites’ plans for election day

    Today America refreshes. Browsers across the country will be furiously reloading, as very little and then a ton of news hits the web on Election Day. Here are some notes on what to look for:

    — At The Washington Post, the most significant innovation won’t be obvious to readers. Elizabeth Spayd, editor of , told me that they’ve improved the speed with which updates will make their way to the homepage. Post reporters will be filing throughout the day to a blog that runs on . But rather than manually linking to those posts, as they’ve done in the past, “it will be automatically feeding onto the homepage,” Spayd said. It’s a small tweak that could mean a lot when news is breaking. (Before then, you can follow the Post’s popular online chats. Chris Cillizza, who and for the paper, )

    — This is an interesting moment for . The new-media darling has garnered big-media traffic throughout the campaign, and they clearly want to be your first destination for election news today. TPM has a map just like everyone else, and they will link to important stories in addition to their own reporting, which will include live video from Obama headquarters in Chicago. ( and previewed their coverage in recent videos.) I’m a TPM junky, but in all likelihood, I’ll be checking my old-media standbys before heading to TPM for analysis. Still, I know people who have relied on the site as their primary news source for the entire campaign, and it would be interesting to know how many readers head to TPM first on Election Day.

    The New York Times wants to know how you’re feeling today. To fill the anxious time before polls begin to close in Kentucky and Indiana (6 p.m. Eastern), the paper of record is asking readers, “” They’ll present the results in a word cloud that will undoubtedly become a lexical representation of chewed-up fingernails. The Times’ editor of digital news, Jim Roberts, in a post yesterday. Among other neat features, they’ve got a with election results that looks great in your Firefox or Internet Explorer sidebar or on your iPhone.

    The Huffington Post is embracing its aggregation approach with a from a range of major news organizations, none of which will see a dime from that placement. But HuffPost is certainly cashing in on the election traffic, turning over the wings of its to a huge BlackBerry ad. If NBC, CNN, and others could calculate the revenue they’re losing to Arianna Huffington today, which fortunately they can’t, would they be as forthcoming and open with their widgets?

    — Several news organizations and consortiums are encouraging voters to record their votes in ways that could help journalists and watchdog groups keep track of long lines and irregularities. There are efforts by holograms, but NBC is etching a map of the U.S. on the ice skating rink at Rockefeller Center. It’s unclear how this will add any value, but I will definitely tune in to see it, which is, of course, the point.

    — And finally, and Slate’s have made a habit of leaking the Associated Press’ exit poll numbers before the embargo is lifted. Much has been about that phenomenon, but maybe the story this year, when it inevitably happens again, will be that nobody bats an eye.

    POSTED     Nov. 4, 2008, 10:41 a.m.
    Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
    Plus: How YouTubers spread far-right beliefs (don’t just blame algorithms), and another cry for less both-sides journalism.
    Public or closed? How much activity really exists? See how other news organizations’ Facebook Groups are faring
    We analyzed the data of groups as large as 40,000 members and as small as 300, from international organizations to local publishers. How does yours fit in?
    Here’s what the Financial Times is doing to get bossy man voice out of (okay, less prominent in) its opinion section
    “She wrote a fabulous piece that did incredibly well and I think there’s no way on earth that (a) she would have submitted or (b) it would have run, before we started this stuff. It got more than double the usual number of pageviews for an opinion piece.”